The way the media are loving up bullflogs you'd think we lost by 21 goals.
A few less turnovers and more tackles and we would have pushed for a win
A few less turnovers and more tackles and we would have pushed for a win
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Different players.He won't be as good as Goldy now, or ever.
I suppose I'm asking whether you can see him being not a liability in the short term and possibly a decent level ruckman in the medium term. I thought he was getting better at the level late last year and before the injury.
Yeah, the BMac one I thought was TT but it was Shiels who was on him. Shiels Corr and CW went the fly, Sheils chased the crumbs and Corr couldn’t go with CW who pushed forward.Corr, Logue, Curtis, TT, Lmac, BMac (on his own but Thomas wasn't in screen,) then TT again.
It wasn't a long exposure period and it was against Williams who was a shitmen at the time, but his start against West Coast before he got injured was really good. It was enough for me to breathe more easily about our ruck future, even if he doesn't have Goldy's finesse. He very obviously worked on his game over the preseasonDifferent players.
Goldy is a champion of the game, great skills and a running machine.
X is your Nankervis type, big crash and bash, a lot of mongrel.
Will still be a good player that complements our mids I reckon.
I think Clarko gave him the nod.It wasn't a long exposure period and it was against Williams who was a shitmen at the time, but his start against West Coast before he got injured was really good. It was enough for me to breath more easily about our ruck future, even if he doesn't have Goldy's finesse. He very obviously worked on his game over the preseason
To be fair I think for three of his goals, Tarryn was his direct opponent.
Is it though? They had 30 scoring shots, which is usually concerning, but I thought our defence held up to the onslaught of I50s pretty ok. There wasn’t the usual parade of depressing uncontested forward 50 marks that have been our stick in trade.Joey gave the backline a serve on First Crack, fair enough.
If McDonald wasn’t Captain he would be dropped.
We are stuck playing this spud.
I was actually just thinking that while I found some of the loose checking frustrating, the defence was a lot more solid than it was earlier in the season when teams much more regularly kicked to unmarked targets.Is it though? They had 30 scoring shots, which is usually concerning, but I thought our defence held up to the onslaught of I50s pretty ok. There wasn’t the usual parade of depressing uncontested forward 50 marks that have been our stick in trade.
View attachment 1716139
The weekly embarrassing thrashings and general hopelessness are fading away, we’re staying in games longer, there‘s a bit more skill and polish around the team mainly due to the youngsters, we’re kicking more goals, we seem a bit more organised and the team spirit seems to be there. We were quite efficient today considering the I50’s and time in fwd half stats. This is pleasing. I think after the bye we need to win 2-3 games to give everyone the confidence that we’re on the right track.
You would think the game becomes pretty simple when a player like Weightman starts tearing you apart. One job stop him.Good opportunity to really set some standards and show a performance like that won’t be tolerated no matter who the * you are.
Was dreadful today.
Slow and reactive.
Yeah, but this sort of thing happens every week. i don't 100% agree with you about Stevo but I do agree with some of your criticism of him and especially of people who miss his errors then say he is great when he's just been okay.Yeah, the BMac one I thought was TT but it was Shiels who was on him. Shiels Corr and CW went the fly, Sheils chased the crumbs and Corr couldn’t go with CW who pushed forward.
What it shows is that LMac is being blamed for s**t by other players.
Not all. Mostly tho.Last year against this mob inside 50’s were 43-67. Today was 36-72.
It’s all LMacs fault!
Except Goldstein. Bit of an indictment really. Older players have held back and cost the side the past month.There is a lot of stick-in-the-mud posting, people reacting like we just got done by 100 points. I am really happy how we played, we obviously have a long way to go but we basically have no worthwhile senior players over 25.
Say what you like about Port but their captain was dropped three weeks ago and is playing reserves. That’s how you set standards.You would think the game becomes pretty simple when a player like Weightman starts tearing you apart. One job stop him.
Not our bozo Captain. Too interested in trying to run by for a handball so he can bomb it to the opposition.
Luke was very selfish for a so called leader.
Senior players in the back line need to be replaced unfortunately.Perfect summation on first crack. Senior players in the back half need to be a lot better if we are going to start winning games.
Port are in for a rude shock when the take McKay as a FA and he kills their transition out of defence.Say what you like about Port but their captain was dropped three weeks ago and is playing reserves. That’s how you set standards.
McDonald, Corr, McKay and Ziebell in the same backline is an opposition coaches wet dream.Senior players in the back line need to be replaced unfortunately.
We got flogged last year and were actually in this game more than i kind of thought. So maybe the backline did better under pressure than they're getting credit for.Last year against this mob inside 50’s were 43-67. Today was 36-72.
It’s all LMacs fault!