Nick Daicos already GOAT by round 6 this year.
/thread
/thread
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Atkins was good - very reliable performances that get consistent BnF votes rather than Brownlow votes - , probably picked up coaches votes most frequently of any Cats player in the back end of the year - and yes it goes beyond stats, he was the only one contesting and defending too a lot of the time around the clinches. Dangerfield was our best attacking mid when he was in there, but moreso before he broke his ribs and played out the season from that difficulty. Hammy during one game (missing a month after that), broken ribs during another and playing out the season injured meant he picked up few votes after round 9. He was well, well ahead of Martin for coaches and Brownlow votes at that point.Interesting there has been comparison of Danger v Martin in 2023:
Danger finished 8th in their B&F on 62 votes. 73 votes behind Stewart. Tom Atkins finished 2nd and Zac Guthrie 4th, so it wasn’t really a high quality field. (Atkins second …. I’m sure even Cats fans are staggered by that?).
So at least it puts to bed any thought of Danger’s 2023 being anywhere near Martin’s, who made the AA squad and finished a clear 2nd in Richmond’s B&F despite missing 3 games.
I’m sure there’ll be some mental gymnastics to rate Dangers year somehow as high as Martin’s…. or maybe the facts will finally win out ..??
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Atkins was good - very reliable performances that get consistent BnF votes rather than Brownlow votes - , probably picked up coaches votes most frequently of any Cats player in the back end of the year - and yes it goes beyond stats, he was the only one contesting and defending too a lot of the time around the clinches. Dangerfield was our best attacking mid when he was in there, but moreso before he broke his ribs and played out the season from that difficulty. Hammy during one game (missing a month after that), broken ribs during another and playing out the season injured meant he picked up few votes after round 9. He was well, well ahead of Martin for coaches and Brownlow votes at that point.
Remember, Martin's two best games came when the season was already over for Richmond. Even with that, Dangerfield finished on 87% the amount of coaches votes as Martin and had 50% more Brownlow votes. Not bad despite the bad injuries.
He somehow had 9 more goal assists than Martin with a couple games less - 70% game time vs 85% for Martin. It's curious.
Comp for forwards is less (even Breust made AA squad), and although Martin basically acted as an extra midfielder his official status was as a forward. Then there were the 4 extra games missed or incurring injuries through them. But no, Dangerfield's season STILL despite all of that was pretty close to Martin's. Minus dead rubbers, he wins the coaches votes and Brownlow votes but was lower in the BnF.
You can always tell you're struggling when you revert to.(this part of season, against this group of teams, at this time of day) type separations.Martin v Danger:
Disposal average: 23.6 v 20.5
Score Inv: 154 v 106
Goals: 25 v 11
GA’s: 15 v 24
As you’ve said with comparisons previously, with scoring related stats it’s the totals that count.
So more of the ball despite Danger playing permanent midfield, more goals, way more scoreboard impact, AA squad, 2nd in B&F v 8th … and better performances against top-8 teams:
Martin got 25 coaches votes against top-8 teams, so 53% of his 47 votes v top-8 at 2.5 per game.
Danger got 15 votes against top-8, so 37% of his 41 votes v top-8 at 1.67 per game.
Brownlow; Martin got 5 votes v top-8 and Danger got 4-votes.
The B&F shows your coaches didn’t think Danger had a very good year. AA selectors didn’t consider him. He captained a dominant flag team to out of the finals.
But but but … Martin played a couple of good games when Richmond couldn’t make finals, so their seasons were very similar.
I repeat… Danger got 62 B&F votes…. Guthrie got 87, Atkins got 105 and Stewart got 135. So it wasn’t just him finishing 8th … it was the huge chasm to the leaders.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
You can always tell you're struggling when you revert to.(this part of season, against this group of teams, at this time of day) type separations.
The only thing we've identified that matters as these isolating factors are:
-Games when side was in finals contention (e.g not dead rubbers). Because the game doesn't matter any more than a pre season contest. Look at Geelong putting 10 players to surgery the second they couldn't make finals.
So:
Dangerfield: 12 Brownlow votes, 41 coaches votes
Martin: 5 Brownlow votes, 30 coaches votes
When their sides season was alive. On that, Dangerfield clearly wins. It's not that close. I give that preference over a Geelong BnF finishing place, given Dahlhaus did well in 2019.
Dusty has the statistical edge you alluded to.
Ultimately in a line ball decision it goes to Martin, from sheer minutes/games played. Give Dangerfield 20 and Martin 18 games and that would be flipped. Therefore, "in the same ball park". Quite obviously behind Ablett 2019, as we agreed on a few days ago, but close to each other.
As are you with what I've presented.Danger 8th in B&F (43 votes behind Tom Atkins and less than half the votes of the winner) no AA squad.
Martin 2nd in B&F and AA squad.
You’re welcome to whatever somersaults you wish to equate these seasons.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
As long as there are a couple of goldfish Geelong supporters that keep taking the bait.How many years will this thread go on for?
4 more yearsHow many years will this thread go on for?
A pure mid or half back will never be the goat.Two max, by then it will be obvious who the GOAT is and the thread will be even more ridiculous View attachment 1824025
He's gonna kick millions of goals, and set up even more, sit back and enjoy a TRUE GOATA pure mid or half back will never be the goat.
He's gonna kick millions of goals, and set up even more, sit back and enjoy a TRUE GOAT
But Daicos won the BnF.We are told he played the greatest season ever seen by a 20yo player in the history of the game … it was just good enough to pip Tom Mitchell - who played multiple games as sub - in the B&F.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
The AA CHB finished 9th or 10th didn't he? So maybe finishing close to the bottom of the top 10 in a BnF in a top 2 side isn't a big deal. And maybe we should apologise to Martin 2019 etc for that, while not OVER criticising a player like Moore for finishing 9th instead of 2nd (in a poor side).We are told he played the greatest season ever seen by a 20yo player in the history of the game … it was just good enough to pip Tom Mitchell - who played multiple games as sub - in the B&F.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Who cares. Brownlow votes dispute otherwise. Everyone knows he would have won it if not for the injury.We are told he played the greatest season ever seen by a 20yo player in the history of the game … it was just good enough to pip Tom Mitchell - who played multiple games as sub - in the B&F.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
You didn't actually use any facts though. It is your opinion he would have won the brownlow and it is your opinion he is the best 20 year old. A 20 year old in his first season kicked 100 goals. That is a fact.Who cares. Brownlow votes dispute otherwise. Everyone knows he would have won it if not for the injury.
In any case, Collingwood are premiers. And this '' kid '' is the best anyone's ever seen for his age. Absoloute gun.
You can cry all you want. It doesn't change facts. It just exposes your feelings of hatred and jealousy. Good luck with that
Lucky for him he pushes forward and kicks goals too.A pure mid or half back will never be the goat.
Not like Dustin does.Lucky for him he pushes forward and kicks goals too.
What was Dusty doing in his 2nd year?Not like Dustin does.
Taking eckies and partying. He didn't need his Nonna to cook his meals either.What was Dusty doing in his 2nd year?
A lot has changed between now and the early 2000s in terms of media fawning, focus etc, so I don’t pay that much attention to Brownlow votes, but Judd’s first year was better, imo.Who cares. Brownlow votes dispute otherwise. Everyone knows he would have won it if not for the injury.
In any case, Collingwood are premiers. And this '' kid '' is the best anyone's ever seen for his age. Absoloute gun.
You can cry all you want. It doesn't change facts. It just exposes your feelings of hatred and jealousy. Good luck with that
Who cares. Brownlow votes dispute otherwise. Everyone knows he would have won it if not for the injury.
In any case, Collingwood are premiers. And this '' kid '' is the best anyone's ever seen for his age. Absoloute gun.
You can cry all you want. It doesn't change facts. It just exposes your feelings of hatred and jealousy. Good luck with that