Burton for Marshall.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lorenz has been pretty consistent, he deserves a go, even if it's just as a sub.I think it'll be Burton and Dixon for Marshall and Lorenz.
I like Lorenz, but it's a huge ask to be getting him to play his first games at this time of year. Was actually surprised we didn't roll with Williams as sub personally.
Does the filter not work on people of African descent?
It does now.Wow.
The other side of the draw may well have the 2 sides that've absolutely smashed us this year.
Which ironically is probably our best chance.Wow.
The other side of the draw may well have the 2 sides that've absolutely smashed us this year.
We played Vissenti and Sweet together against Fremantle . Had it messed Sweet ruck work ? . On contrary , our pressure and ball movement was elite because of younger bodies and better ruck support to Sweet .Sweet just played the best game of his career by a long way. I got a good idea… let’s bring in a second ruck to mess with it.
I’m with you on this. Sweet played his best game for us against Fremantle, his first really big game for us, and I put it down to Visentini playing.We played Vissenti and Sweet together against Fremantle . Had it messed Sweet ruck work ? . On contrary , our pressure and ball movement was elite because of younger bodies and better ruck support to Sweet .
I think we just look better without Dixon.Forward line without Marshall is a worry - we look a lot better when he was on the ground
That's because we do.I think we just look better without Dixon.
High rewardApparently Farrel is a real chance at playing. Would be a massive risk though.