Lawnchair Larry
Cancelled
- Apr 1, 2015
- 2,627
- 3,099
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
My perception at the moment is that this is a more mobile disease than SARS of 2003, but with a lower mortality rate.One of my friends (a physicist, not a doctor) has pointed out to me that the 2% fatality rate might be false, or at least inaccurate.
It seems to have been arrived at by dividing the number of deaths/number confirmed cases = fatality rate.
However, the disease has an incubation period, illness period and death/recovery of ~2weeks. Which means that that calculation should be number of deaths/number of confirmed cases 2 weeks ago = fatality rate.
This brings the fatality rate up above 10%. It is worth noting though that only older people (~50+) and people with existing conditions (diabetes/respiratory) have actually died so far.
I have seen SARS mortality figures of 10%, and even up to 15%. We are not there yet IMO. Im thinking that this disease is making up for its lower mortality by hitting more people.
We shall see.
I take your point about back correcting, but not by 14 days, as others have suggested.