List Mgmt. Draft Needs 2018 #2: Rankine / Lukosius / Rozee / Hately, I'm knocking Woodcock out the box, daily!

Predict the Adelaide board's melt level after the draft


  • Total voters
    123
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

I actually rate Valente higher than O’Halloran as a prospect, so in a vacuum I’d be happier with that haul, however Valente doesn’t suit our needs with his lack of pace
I do too and think he’s underrated , just not overly suited to our current squad

Who knows in 3-4 yrs time

Hawks had Mitchell Hodge Lewis and Sewell in their glory years , not much speed there

Good players are good players as long as surround them with speed
 
I get that but I don’t get patting yourself on the back and talking up how many picks you’ve got, if you’ve only got them because you’ve lost quality players.

Port have done it too, “we wanted quality picks in this strong draft” ignoring they’ve lost Polec and Wingard plus a heap of picks to do it.

How else do you get them ?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I do too and think he’s underrated , just not overly suited to our current squad

Who knows in 3-4 yrs time

Hawks had Mitchell Hodge Lewis and Sewell in their glory years , not much speed there

Good players are good players as long as surround them with speed
I reckon we go pace with the early picks and hope he slides a bit. We will need someone of his type in a few years but will we persist with him until the Sloanes of the world retire.
 
That’s not what the data shows though. If you want a superstar you need to be high up

Last five Brownlow Medal winners and their draft pick:

2018 Mitchell - (16; Freo bid for him at 16, was awarded selection number of 21 due to weird f/s rules back then)

2017 Martin (3)

2016 Dangerfield (10)

2015 Fyfe (20)

2014 Priddis (31 in the rookie draft).
 
I think Valente could end up a steal

MVP of the most talented SA team in a decade isn’t a bad start

84 % Efficiency as an inside mid is almost unheard of

Under the radar
Agreed, and of very very good character which is a big deal for us. I reckon we take him with 16 actually.

Bit of a reach but he does deserve to be a first rounder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top