- Sep 28, 2016
- 10,133
- 20,418
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
McPherson has Kelly’s spot for the rest of the season for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didnt mind the lady umpGood: Smithy
Bad: Lady Umpire - Go back to the magoos until you learn how to bounce the ball
Ugly: Treacle Hartigan, The Seagull Jumper
Me eitherHow many more times do I need to yell at the TV before he’ll play on??
I swear he’s not listening to me
We would have lost by 200 points.
I know you're saying that multiple times in every thread, but Stengle, Frampton, McAsey and McHenry were all absolute zeros today. Jones got a lot of midfield rotations for only 11 possessions, and McAdam finally did something okay late.
Our only hope is you being right. But you're gonna post it over and over again whether you are or not.
fu** off, this is a lazy take by someone who is a casual football fan. Prob one of those “Just kick it” type operators.
Hes 19, playing in a key position in a team that may be the worst in living memory. A team whose backline is completely under siege all game with a midfield who apply zero pressure.
He then goes forward, and plays in a team where the ball is being delivered by the likes of Matt “The Rainmaker” Crouch. A couple of real solid clunks today showed me has it. His floor is a real solid Key position player, his ceiling is massive.
That kind of thinking will have M Crouch as BoG for us today.We would have lost by 200 points.
No, he's probably not, but his passion for the contest is really encouraging.Hats off to him, he’s work rate is good and he’s doing a respectable defensive job, but I just don’t think he’s going to make it.
You listed four forwards who offered us not much. I wonder why they offered not much?
Was it that we had only 24 inside 50s in the entire match (versus 49 for WC)?
Was that because we were smashed in clearances 17-28?
Piss off, mate. He's done fu** all and you're looking through blinders. You're another of those imbeciles who is going to post the same sh*t week in and week out, no matter what happens.
I hope to Christ he amounts to something, because we spent an extraordinarily early pick on him, and so far he's just run around trying to make a contest. Hopefully he learns something from the absolute clinic that was run on him by the West Coast key defenders today.
Hats off to him, he’s work rate is good and he’s doing a respectable defensive job, but I just don’t think he’s going to make it.
Certainly, but there were some really poor decision making across the middle too. You know the ones, dumb disposals to a mate under pressure instead of getting it in there.You listed four forwards who offered us not much. I wonder why they offered not much?
Was it that we had only 24 inside 50s in the entire match (versus 49 for WC)?
Was that because we were smashed in clearances 17-28?
Except we already have half a team of kids who are barely doing anything, and are getting encouragement awards from desperate fans.No, we wouldn't have.
Removing Matt Crouch, Sloane and Laird from that game would have been a massive positive for us. They pretty much f’ed up everything they touched (outside of that goal from Sloane). Offered effectively nothing defensively as well.
You could potentially argue there would have been a negative from removing Lynch and B.Crouch.
Piss off, mate. He's done fu** all and you're looking through blinders. You're another of those imbeciles who is going to post the same sh*t week in and week out, no matter what happens.
I hope to Christ he amounts to something, because we spent an extraordinarily early pick on him, and so far he's just run around trying to make a contest. Hopefully he learns something from the absolute clinic that was run on him by the West Coast key defenders today.
Tried him in the middle, but he doesn't have the workrate for it to be a good move. Hasn't clicked for him like it did for McAdam that he needs to work his ass off to keep his spot. The goals will come from that.Frampton and McCasey were fine, but Stengle spent a lot of time up the ground and was disappointing. That play that led to Liam Ryan kicking their 10th summed him up - risky but attacking kick to him in the centre square, he doesn't run hard enough at the ball to mark in the clear, doesn't make enough effort to mark in a contest, and makes no effort at all once the ball hits the ground.
Are you for real? Criticising McAsey because he got given a bath by... *checks notes*... JEREMY MCGOVERN!?
In his first ever game at AFL level playing forward, you're having a go at McAsey for merely "running around" up against one of the best defenders in the entire league, with our putrid forward entries.
Of all the players in the match to have a go at. ******* hell
Just looking forward for an option would be an improvement.How many more times do I need to yell at the TV before he’ll play on??
I swear he’s not listening to me
Spot on!!!We cannot in this modern day, play Hartigan, Talia, Brown and Kelly in the same backline. There is a reason they are not manned up by the opposition on the switch, it’s because they are no threat to take the game on and hit a target. They are complete momentum killers. Kelly especially. Ideally he needs to go for an attacking player and if he plays there needs to be a blanket rule that no one kicks to him, I don’t care if there’s no one around him for 100 mins, don’t ******* kick it to him.
Ten Melbourne clubs are rubbing their hands together watching him develop. His managers phone is ringing hot!McAsey showed real promise as a Key Forward, people need to realise this is a 19 year old Key Position player in one of the worst teams in living memory. Has shown real glimpses of what he will develop in to.
Jones got a lot of time around the ball and McHenry and Stengle pushed forward, and they still just don't get their hands on it.You listed four forwards who offered us not much. I wonder why they offered not much?
Was it that we had only 24 inside 50s in the entire match (versus 49 for WC)?
Was that because we were smashed in clearances 17-28?