- Oct 2, 2016
- 12,329
- 25,791
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I think Hawks list is better than they are performing. If Mitchell wasn't a club champion there would be a great focus on him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
This. What Geelong have done to defy gravity is outstanding, but let’s stop pretending they’ve managed to purely draft their way out of their decline.
Been said before but Hawthorn's big mistake was misjudging where their list was and going after O'Meara and Mitchell to try and extend their premiership window.
They would have had picks 10 and 14 in the 2016 draft (assuming they still traded with St Kilda) and that would have given them access to any two of Florent, Simpkin, Berry, Powell-Pepper, Hayward or English.
Two of those players would have definitely helped.
Harsh on WCE. They are off the couch for now.
They wouldn’t have traded with st kilda. Probably would have got a midfielder
Harsh on WCE. They are off the couch for now.
Adelaide North Hawks Eagles.
Only one of those teams deliberately tanked. Change the title
So Richmond and WCE only then (and that’s Richmond with injury list)This is pretty accurate. Other than North, every team we've played is in the 8 (3 in the top 4) or just outside (Pies and Suns). I can see us getting a string of wins when we play sides around us.
Another benefit to not getting Mitchell and O'Meara though is that Hawthorn would not have done as well in 2017, 2018 and 2019, which on the surface makes no sense, but that would have meant Hawthorn as a club would have accepted their rebuild earlier, and begun earlier. It would also mean better draft picks to actually rebuild with in those years.
Certainly. In 2017 Burgoyne 34 hodge 32 smith 28 Shiels 25 Langford 24 hartung 22 orourke 23 Howe 21
Just 3 aged 24-29
Took them all of 2022 & 2023 for them to work him out….Opposition have worked him out, thats all.
Why are we still talking about this? None of those mentioned players are going to move the needle.Been said before but Hawthorn's big mistake was misjudging where their list was and going after O'Meara and Mitchell to try and extend their premiership window.
They would have had picks 10 and 14 in the 2016 draft (assuming they still traded with St Kilda) and that would have given them access to any two of Florent, Simpkin, Berry, Powell-Pepper, Hayward or English.
Two of those players would have definitely helped.
Been said before but Hawthorn's big mistake was misjudging where their list was and going after O'Meara and Mitchell to try and extend their premiership window.
They would have had picks 10 and 14 in the 2016 draft (assuming they still traded with St Kilda) and that would have given them access to any two of Florent, Simpkin, Berry, Powell-Pepper, Hayward or English.
Two of those players would have definitely helped.
Why are we still talking about this? None of those mentioned players are going to move the needle.
Discussion should be on how we improve now.
Opposition have worked him out, thats all.
Put a player on him to niggle and take his mind off the game and he reacts accordingly.
Sisily is getting beaten between the ears and that has affected his output. Not a great weakness to have being captain. The midfield getting smashed doesnt help either.
Another benefit to not getting Mitchell and O'Meara though is that Hawthorn would not have done as well in 2017, 2018 and 2019, which on the surface makes no sense, but that would have meant Hawthorn as a club would have accepted their rebuild earlier, and begun earlier. It would also mean better draft picks to actually rebuild with in those years.
I suspect Clarkson thought "bring in Mitchell and O'Meara for Burgoyne and Smith and everything will continue as normal" but the problem with that is it was forgetting the other aging stars in the Hawthorn team, and how you were about to lose some important Key Position players too.
Losing Roughead would have been quite a loss as he was a very underrated player by non-Hawks fans.
Realistically we should have rebuilt after 2016. Targeted the 16, 17, 18, 19 drafts. 2018 in particular.They would have moved the needle as having another 2 experienced players in the Hawthorn team would be quite useful right now. Wouldn't make Hawthorn a top 8 side or anything, but would make them more competitive.
You don't have to agree with it, Melbourne as a team play awful sometimes & May, Lever & Gawn seem to always carry them.I think that says a lot more about the respective quality of the Hawthorn and Melbourne sides and less so on Sicily and Lever.
I mean seriously that is a bizarre take.
You don't have to agree with it, Melbourne as a team play awful sometimes & May, Lever & Gawn seem to always carry them.
You don't have to agree with it, Melbourne as a team play awful sometimes & May, Lever & Gawn seem to always carry them.
No doubt but we also make our own luck.
Kelly and Clark net us Conway and Cameron while Stephens brings in Henry. It's strategic recruitment with a little bit of 'go home factor' help along the way.
Realistically we should have rebuilt after 2016. Targeted the 16, 17, 18, 19 drafts. 2018 in particular.
We just need better ball use and key position players. We beat you in inside 50s and in the contest yesterday. Just need more polish and options inside 50.
Imagine we didn’t find Sicily, Moore, Worpel, Lewis, Morrison, Hardwick with later picks. Disaster. Plus Newcombe a couple years ago and we got lucky getting Scrimshaw for next to nothing.Cyril retiring early. Gillan sabotaging the coniglio move.
Vickery, Patton, Hartley opportunity cost though. Granted draftees were already 4th round but a gem may have been found