- Aug 21, 2007
- 32,983
- 108,659
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Aston Villa, San Antonio Spurs
And Trengove absolutely could have played a solid role in our 2016-present backline given the amount of games we've given to Clurey and a finished Jonas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And Trengove absolutely could have played a solid role in our 2016-present backline given the amount of games we've given to Clurey and a finished Jonas.
And who does this? I know I've never claimed Hinkley is successful.We've absolutely improved in terms of structure and selection philosophy which has gone a long way toward that better regular season record. We've undeniably bungled our ruck and KPD development.
Cognitive dissonance is claiming success for a coach in an industry where success is very well defined and he hadn't had any.
So you're saying this current list, defined by you as the last 4 years, is good enough?Ooh, oooh, I can play Port Adelaide Jeopardy too! The category is 'Port drafting and selection 'mis-takes':
One of the KPD Port Adelaide blooded during Ken Hinkley's tenure as coach.
"Who was Logan Austin?"PLAYERCARDSTART24Logan Austin
- Age
- 29
- Ht
- 196cm
- Wt
- 92kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 11.9
- 3star
- K
- 7.7
- 3star
- HB
- 4.2
- 3star
- M
- 4.4
- 4star
- T
- 1.8
- 4star
- MG
- 172.3
- 3star
No current season stats available
- D
- 8.2
- 2star
- K
- 5.8
- 3star
- HB
- 2.4
- 3star
- M
- 3.2
- 4star
- T
- 1.4
- 4star
- MG
- 126.8
- 2star
PLAYERCARDEND
This was the reason why Port Adelaide never developed a KPD from the draft.
"What is a policy of selecting the best available player in late rounds?"
Jackson Trengove never played in defence after 2015 for this reason.
"What was he wasn't suited to playing a forward half territory game?"
And for the Daily Double, why do people on this board still obsess over this rubbish when our current list has made top four 3 out of the last 4 years, while still lumping it in with the failures of the 2013-2017 list when discussing the tenure of the coach.
"What is cognitive dissonance?"
And yet you want to keep him.And who does this? I know I've never claimed Hinkley is successful.
And who does this? I know I've never claimed Hinkley is successful.
NoDo you think Hinkley is a good head coach and would be better than realistic alternatives?
You got him on the run big time.
I like Trengove and have chatted to him a bit over the years and he's a great guy. That being said, he played his last year at Port in 2017 playing 19 games - but largely not as a defender, then went to the bulldogs as a defender and played 16, 16, and 1 games across 2018, 2019, 2020 before being delisted/retiring.
While its clear he hit his cliff over the past 12 months or so, Jonas in 3 of those 4 years was a member of the All Australian squad as a defender. I think the claim that Jonas was finished in the period that Trengove was active is a fair revision of history. We shouldn't be-little his output in earler years based on our perceptions of his performance this year, or the fsact we dont like the odd comment he's made as captain.
Thatas all well and good, but I was responding to your coment where you said " the amount of games we've given to Clurey and a finished Jonas." when its pretty clear that Jonas was far from finished while he was getting games in defence and Trengove wasn't.Sure, Jonas in 2017 was an excellent player, but i'm more talking about whether there was role for Trengove from the time he was moved out of the backline to fill a need in the ruck until now.
No current season stats available
I think Hinkley is irrelevant. Good coach, bad coach, it doesn't matter. I'm reminded of a scene from Martian Successor Nadesico:Do you think Hinkley is a good head coach and would be better than realistic alternatives?
Thatas all well and good, but I was responding to your coment where you said " the amount of games we've given to Clurey and a finished Jonas." when its pretty clear that Jonas was far from finished while he was getting games in defence and Trengove wasn't.
I think Hinkley is irrelevant. Good coach, bad coach, it doesn't matter.
Trengove is 32. Had he stayed in our defence he could still be playing now. He moved to the Bulldogs and basically fell out of love with it.
You are digressing as that has nothing to do with your Jonas jibe.
But the fact he went to the dogs, was played in defence and was done at 29 suggests you are probably incorrect.