Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep. As I was writing that I had that example in my mind. The alir and his mate knocking each other out sprung to mind as well. Remember they both were cleared of concussion.It would be hard to beat Ports decision to play Rozee the week after doing his hammy.
An anomaly that happened two years in a row?If you take out 97 and 98 which let’s face it are anomalies, we are very much a loser club.
If you take out 97 and 98 which let’s face it are anomalies, we are very much a loser club.
Probably because you made it up?How the hell would I know he had 5:1 hitouts to advantage at qtr if I didn't watch?
I like Keane as a forward I think he would be a handful for defenderswhere to start - and where to finish after two weeks of depressingly bad football.
The weekends match against South will be important but given the likely wet conditions and gale force winds we may not gain too much insight.
If Murray survives match and plays well hes in
If Taylor can play in the middle and show some form he is in.
If Tex is fit he will play.
If Cook is fit hes back in.
If Pedlar can display some of the form of last year and up his performance in the second half last week he's in.
If Curtin can play a half decent game hes also in.
So who goes out
Strauchnie is injured so he is an out. ROB comes in by default.
Baby Jon Burgess is an out for Tex. He may never ever play AFL football again.
Keays is an out for Cook. One is skilled the other is not.
Taylor comes in For Ned. One has vision and football smarts - the other runs around like a chicken with its head cut off.
Curtin if he can play well come in for Smithy. That weak effort in the last qr where he piqued a physical confrontation with Richmond players was deplorable for a senior player and team leader.
Rankine comes in for Murphy.
Pedlar comes in for Sholl who showed on the weekend he cannot win one on one contests in the air.
Murray comes in for Borlase but he remains as a sub. I would play him forward but if not he can play centre half back and Keane can go to back pocket.
Team could look like this:
Borlase Tex Rachele
Cook Fogarty Pedlar
Nankervis Soligo Hinge
Curtin Murray Max
Laird Butts Keane
ROB, Dawson, Rankine
Reserves: Jones, Harry, Taylor, Dowling
Sub: Berry
What happened to Sanders?Out: the wrong people in key posts
In: don’t care, leave them vacant if need be. Better than these hacks
How is it nonsense?What nonsense.
If you play that stupid game and take away a Milne bounce and a bad advantage call and Collingwood have zero premierships in that same time frame and are just as much a loser club just like us.
Agree with this 100% players need to develop in an afl standard environment, the good ones have a knack of working it outAgreed Curtin was pretty rubbish, but maybe just one of those players that flourishes in the big time. Can't imagine our development in the SANFL is doing him any favours....
Brodie will have 35 and 14 R50's this week and be back in.That's because Nicks has spent a lot of effort "rebuilding" the side by pumping games into said omitted senior players (and other trash tier players) rather than developing the next generation
The selectors have done no favours by playing Smith out of form & also reverting him from wing to defence.Brodie will have 35 and 14 R50's this week and be back in.
The thing with Smith is I think he could have still had a positive impact for us this year. Playing him when he was half injured did no favours for him. And moving him up to the wing like at the end of last season could have freed him up more and utilised his (albeit more hack like now) ling kicks into the fwd 50.
Plus having senior bodies around the kids is always good to give them a break.
The issue is not judging him on his form and fitness and managing that with rests or being omitted when required - instead seeing him languish when younger guys could be getting time into them turns the supporters on him. Again it's all down to the selectors/coaches.
If we has dropped him after the first few weeks and only bought him back when he was fresh and when injuries hit/kids needed a break we'd mostly all be fine with it. And Brodie probably would have been playing alot better too...
Still a great for the crows in my eyes and one of my favourite players of the 2010s era.
How is it nonsense?
We’ve not seen anything like those two years, and I don’t think we ever will again. Perfect storm of having several champion players via start up concessions, and a genius coach who was the antithesis of everything that our culture has since become.
Since then it’s been nothing but heartache mostly via incompetence. Choke in finals, poor appointments, don’t attract gun players, draft sanctions, camps.
That’s how we roll, not what happened in 97 98. So again, if it’s bullshit, tell me how we are superior to those clubs in 2024?
I'm sure he meant in the AFL era?We are.
Saints have one flag btw.
I was thereHow the hell would I know he had 5:1 hitouts to advantage at qtr if I didn't watch?
He also only had 4 hit outs for the 1st term so it’s unlikely that he had 5 to advantageI was there
Given that rob was pretty much the worst on ground, regularly hit it straight to hawks players, who annihilated us in clearances, and that rob was completely destroyed by his opponent, including by the hawks backup ruck, quoting stats as though it shows that he is good is basically meaningless. So bad that we dropped him.
Not that strachan was any good the following week either
The bolded bit is exactly why I think he would be worth a try up forward. Especially during the remainder of this season where there is a chance to see what the list has to offer. Agree with the promise of Borlase - whether up forward or down back. I personally think down back is probably where he is best suited and he probably ends up battling with Butts for that lock down defender role in a full strength side. Same with Worrell and Keane battling for the same spot if Murray plays as a defender. Fingers crossed that is how it works anyway. I remember being excited by seeing Smith, Milera and Seedsman all playing in the same team at their peak, but unfortunately that never eventuated.Murray is a bruising, hard, crash-pack and intimidating defender and will be our Tex in the backline, for years.
Borlase is the one I'd be playing forward --- he's far better skilled than Burgess and showed some flair last week when forward.
Plus, we need some muscle up there eg compare Himmelberg who looks like a scrawny tall boy next to Borlase who's got the shoulders of a swimmer/wrestler. Even his ears look muscled , he moves well and looks to me a better forward prospect than both Cook and Gollant.
While I'm at it, I've loved what Nankervis has shown.
How is it nonsense?
We’ve not seen anything like those two years, and I don’t think we ever will again. Perfect storm of having several champion players via start up concessions, and a genius coach who was the antithesis of everything that our culture has since become.
Since then it’s been nothing but heartache mostly via incompetence. Choke in finals, poor appointments, don’t attract gun players, draft sanctions, camps.
That’s how we roll, not what happened in 97 98. So again, if it’s bullshit, tell me how we are superior to those clubs in 2024?
Jones to Gulden as well.Wouldn't mind seeing Max M given a job on Heeney.
Let Max have a real good look at one of the comps best and see if he can do a real defensive midfield job on him.
Nothing to really lose at this point...
I like that. It’s crazy more coaches don’t use shut down players that can hurt the other way, Jordan from Sydney is killing it.Wouldn't mind seeing Max M given a job on Heeney.
Let Max have a real good look at one of the comps best and see if he can do a real defensive midfield job on him.
Nothing to really lose at this point...