Autopsy Round 3 v West Coast roast toast and changes for Brisbane

[Tiger_Of_Old]

Think they said Edwards would miss a couple

Did they.Ok.No change then.

 

[Punt rd end]

Jeep and Puma will be happy

 

[Black Saab]

He was, unlike spud (mistakenly stated rance was many times) on sen who has no idea.

Terrific scalp to claim for young David then. Good on him.

 

[cannot]

[

How many times do you want to edit your posts? It's doing my bloody head in.
Grigg would be in place of Lloyd/Lambert/Hunt.
Have a nice day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

would be yeah

but that doesnt mean its right

if grigg went to mitchell instead of lambert wce would of won

 

[cannot]

Did Grigg kick your dog or something

squibbed it up in too many elimination finals

 

[tunksy]

Especially at a time many in the media are declaring no one tags any more, saying the games moved on to a team effort to curb individuals. Lambert played a decent role yesterday.

Also, was Astbury on Kennedy all game? If so, a two goal give away is a very good defensive effort against a premium forward.

Yep astbury was on kennedy all day. He did very well

 

[prodigy]

[


would be yeah

but that doesnt mean its right

if grigg went to mitchell instead of lambert wce would of won

No they wouldn't have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Rezza Tiger]

I can't stop watching Rioli's goal in the 3rd. Poor Prestia deserves some credit for that too he was right on to that give and go - so quick to feed it back to Rioli.

 

[Tigers_fan24]

I must be in the minority in that Hurn just stood his ground, and didn't think there was anything in it. What is he supposed to do jump out of the way?

The hit was late and would have been paid a 50 if the mark was initially paid. The mistake the umpire made was not paying the clear mark that castanga took

 

[shaky]

I've just watched the replay for the first time and I can explain why it wasn't 50 metres. It's pretty simple. He didn't pay the mark. He paid in the back. If he had paid the mark (which I think he could/should have) then you can pay 50. However without paying the mark, you can't. It's the first infringement in the act of marking. So given he didn't pay the mark first, it simply cannot be 50. So the only issue with it is the fact he didn't pay the mark. They are the rules and they are clear.

Yep agree here.
I thought at the ground it had been paid a mark (I could see clearly from the other end that he took the mark!!!).
Can understand the decision not to pay a 50 if it was paid as an in the back free.
So in the end the umpire still got it wrong.

 

[shaky]

See my explanation above to explain why the Hurn one wasn't 50 metres. In essence the umpire did not pay the mark but paid in the back. So you can't get the 50 metre paid if the free was paid (1 action in this case can't be a free kick AND 50 metres). If the mark had been paid and then he cannoned in to him (could argue the mark should have been paid but it was split second) then it's 50 metres.

Not sure if that is correct.
I think the umpire can still pay a 50 if they believe it is warranted (could be wrong on this though).
In this case as it wasn't overly malicious and the umpire paid a free, not the mark, I can understand why it wasn't 50 also.

 

[tigerimij]

I really liked the way Butler and Rioli flew the flag for Castagna straight in for their mate true tiger spirit from the young ones

 

[deledio7]

I've just skimmed through this thread and what amazes me is the unbelievable amount of negativity aimed at individual players such as Grigg, Caddy, Prestia, Vlastuin for not filling the stat sheet. Take your eyes off the numbers and focus on the way the side is playing. I don't give a shit if Caddy has 15 touches a week if it means Cotchin and Martin are playing the best footy of their careers.

 

[TigermanM2]

I've just skimmed through this thread and what amazes me is the unbelievable amount of negativity aimed at individual players such as Grigg, Caddy, Prestia, Vlastuin for not filling the stat sheet. Take your eyes off the numbers and focus on the way the side is playing. I don't give a shit if Caddy has 15 touches a week if it means Cotchin and Martin are playing the best footy of their careers.

Yep thanks Lids. Cant help but notice that your stats this year are 0.

 

[prodigy]

I've just skimmed through this thread and what amazes me is the unbelievable amount of negativity aimed at individual players such as Grigg, Caddy, Prestia, Vlastuin for not filling the stat sheet. Take your eyes off the numbers and focus on the way the side is playing. I don't give a shit if Caddy has 15 touches a week if it means Cotchin and Martin are playing the best footy of their careers.

Exactly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Grrr]

I've just skimmed through this thread and what amazes me is the unbelievable amount of negativity aimed at individual players such as Grigg, Caddy, Prestia, Vlastuin for not filling the stat sheet. Take your eyes off the numbers and focus on the way the side is playing. I don't give a shit if Caddy has 15 touches a week if it means Cotchin and Martin are playing the best footy of their careers.

If anything Caddy is helping out more forward, sacrificing his game a little because we are a little short and lack strong bodies down there. So is only a part of the midfield group, not a major part as we'd/he'd expected. That could change as the year progresses and if Griff can stay on the park and Lennon or whoever finds some form. Caddy had only 6 possessions to 3/4 time, so a little quiet wouldn't you say.

 

[deledio7]

Yep thanks Lids. Cant help but notice that your stats this year are 0.

Haha well played.

 

[TheLoungeLizard]

OUT: Martin
IN: Hunt

 

[deledio7]

If anything Caddy is helping out more forward, sacrificing his game a little because we are a little short and lack strong bodies down there. So is only a part of the midfield group, not a major part as we'd/he'd expected. That could change as the year progresses and if Griff can stay on the park and Lennon or whoever finds some form. Caddy had only 6 possessions to 3/4 time, so a little quiet wouldn't you say.

He was quiet but who cares? We have 22 blokes playing a manic, high pressure, Bulldogs style of footy at the moment. Unless he becomes a liability on the field his perceived presence is having a positive impact on the rest of the midfield.

 

[Nostradumbass]

Rance winning a 3 v1. Delicious.

 

[JR82]

Round 3 links are up

in this thread? i can't find them here & not sure where else to look

 

[prodigy]

in this thread? i can't find them here & not sure where else to look

Cornet Hotel Sub board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hoos]

The hawks don't have their second rounder too I think.

Good.

 

[partycorolla]

Not sure if that is correct.
I think the umpire can still pay a 50 if they believe it is warranted (could be wrong on this though).
In this case as it wasn't overly malicious and the umpire paid a free, not the mark, I can understand why it wasn't 50 also.

Not sure what you would expect it to be paid for in this instance as the mark wasn't paid? Here is a link to a video showing a similar scenario involving Casboult. On this occasion the umpire deems the mark had been completed, something the umpire didn't do on Saturday (which is the most contentious part of the incident in my opinion and something that Rayzor checked with the umpire who made the call). Once the umpire deems that the mark had been completed he can pay the 50.

http://www.afl.com.au/video/2016-03-17/2017-laws-of-the-game-fifty-metre-penalties

 

[partycorolla]

Think they said Edwards would miss a couple

Was listed as 2-6 weeks on the injury list during last week.