Autopsy Round 7, 2023 : Positives and Negatives v Carlton

Remove this Banner Ad

Not much to like. They all looked tired and over it.

-Thought Witho was actually ok. Goes pretty hard.
  • Clark and Foley are easy delistings. WAFL players
  • West and SPS show good effort but are low production nothing players.
  • Does anyone know why they pulled XON from the middle in the second half? Thought he may finally be putting a good game together but then got put in the forward line.
  • Culley very quiet.
  • Darling is clearly injured. He was in pain in the final quarter.
  • Duggnuts kicks are a chook raffle. A simple kick from defence can end up 5 rows back.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It looks like our plan for dealing with the twin towers with an undersized backline was for Rotham to grow another 10cm and suddenly become a competent defender and I don't know which of those was the more unrealistic.
He was awful. Positioning was poor outmuscled and overwhelmed. Thank god we don't have Lynch next week he'd kick 10.
 
Positives- Cannot find any at the moment, maybe no injuries and we're in-line for a top pick in MSD & ND , really a negative but we need assistance and high draft picks are the key .

Negative - Never won the ruck as convincingly as last week so supply was hard to get .
WC squad was exposed today hopefully they learn from it , Carlton were good .
 
I mean, by keeper do you mean he's going to he retained for another season due to the fact there's 6-8 players worse than him on our list and we can't cut that deep?

For all the fans he's earned recently, if we had a proper list with actual talent, I wouldn't automatically be including SPS.

Handy depth, but failed to take his game to the next level in the AFL and injuries regular derail any good form he has.

Retained by default.
Yes
 
He was awful. Positioning was poor outmuscled and overwhelmed. Thank god we don't have Lynch next week he'd kick 10.

The good news is that unlike last week he didn't give away a bunch of free kicks. The bad news is that it was only because he was so far away from Curnow at most contests that it was physically impossible for him to infringe.
 
The good news is that unlike last week he didn't give away a bunch of free kicks. The bad news is that it was only because he was so far away from Curnow at most contests that it was physically impossible for him to infringe.
He was uncompetitive and miles off it. Bazzo showed more.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I’d like an apology, from those seeking apologies last week,.

BOG pfft, shaded a nobody, this week a up against a very average C grade ruck…..and then?
And was perfectly serviceable.

Williams - 13 touches, 4 tackles, 21 HOs, 5 clearances

Pittonet- 13 touches, 1 mark, 6 tackles, 35 HOs, 6 clearances

Plenty of players tonight to single out. Williams is not one of them.
 
It looks like our plan for dealing with the twin towers with an undersized backline was for Rotham to grow another 10cm and suddenly become a competent defender and I don't know which of those was the more unrealistic.
Just a terrible time for HEdwards to be out. Not suggesting he’s a gun (yet) but his extra height would’ve been welcome. Plus great experience for him.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Round 7, 2023 : Positives and Negatives v Carlton

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top