- Feb 29, 2012
- 6,337
- 7,692
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Being that he's not going anywhere for 12 months, the least both Hinkley and the club could do is rediscover their hard edge. Bland, corporate speak has infested Hinkley's approach. A lot has been written on here about what happened after Phil Walsh's passing, and it's clear that impacted his competitiveness, which was fanatical in the beginning.
We never have the head coach (or assistant coaches) establish levels of expected performance from individuals or the team via the media.
We never attempt to influence the narrative around the officiating of the game.
We never attempt to influence and manipulate the approach of opponents through the media.
I could actually stomach Hinkley, Koch and the rest of the brass if they actually made some attempt to play the game. What we are seeing is not incompetence, but a lack of mettle to rock the boat. If you've read the Boys Club, you'd understand that the AFL has us exactly where they want us in that respect - compliant, unquestioning, lacking ruthlessness.
If it's felt that there is something to be gained from protecting players from scrutiny, accountability, hard conversations - and it seems like that is the approach we've taken, 'connection', Ken being a father figure - then it hasn't translated into performance.
So, given that our hands are tied, instead of screaming "sack this, sack" that into the void, I'd simply ask the club to adjust their messaging. Take note from Clarkson, Beveridge, C Scott. Keep the players, opponents and AFL on edge. Demand results, publicly. Then I could almost, just, maybe cop that sort of performance - because then we'd be following a football club, not a business.
Like we tried in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021?