I find that older people have memories of that duplicitous f#ck and young people are stupid and uninformed.I find that anti Ross are old and pro Ross are the young ones
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I find that older people have memories of that duplicitous f#ck and young people are stupid and uninformed.I find that anti Ross are old and pro Ross are the young ones
They did say (in the presser today) that at the start of the year they'd told Brett they'd talk at the half way point, at 8-3 it would be hard not to offer him an extension...not sure what else they could've done at the time.Let me put this another way.
12 weeks ago we extended Ratts contract, it was done off the back of the first 11 rounds of the season and when it was done (and even before) a number of posters in here said it was stupid. We didn’t say that because we’re geniuses or clairvoyants we said it because there was a completely acceptable and reasonable option to just wait until the end of the year to make a decision on his future. He was contracted, he wasn’t in demand and there was absolutely no need to go early. Some semblance of process and consideration would have meant that you didn’t have idiots like me saying “told you so” in October.
We are here again.
If we appoint Ross without any process, without any consideration to other potential candidates and options then when it fails (and it probably will fail) you’ll have idiots like me saying “told you so” again.
Don’t let me say “told you so” just run some interviews, have some blokes do a PowerPoint. Have a candidate sell us on what they’ll bring.
Do the one thing that will make all of us say “well at least we were thorough, couldn’t have done anymore”.
If you do that and Ross has the polo on in a few weeks talking about time trial results then I’ll back him with all the gusto of a 35 year saints man.
If not I’ll be waiting for the fall again.
If he’s head coach he still has to be able to coach. How does he oversee if he doesn’t know what he’s doing?Not sure about this bit. Separation of duties might mean the coach is responsible for motivation and culture and standards and man management. While Rath or similar might be responsible for strategy and gameplan and style etc.
If that’s the case then RTB could definitely do it.
Yep...if we go for RTB need to make sure it won't turn out Blight-esque100%
To be clear I just don’t want us begging Ross and ignoring everyone else.
Personally I don’t think Ross is the answer but wtf do I know?!
I'd love a 17 win 5 loss season again. I know the goal is to win a flag, but just to be competitive would be fantastic.I'm not sure about Ross but he is the last coach that consistently had us winning and relevant. If we could get that back I'd be grateful.
Does anybody care what you do?No bullshit waste of my time and money im a storm member thats enough for me. I enjoy being part of a proffesional organisation. We will start in c grade VAFA when we fold.
I’m not suggesting he’s not a good coach, I’m suggesting that there’s no evidence in the last 8 years to suggest that he still is.
You’re adamant that him getting a team to a grand final 8 years ago means he’s good, it doesn’t.
TomatoeSource?
You don’t know what else they could have done?They did say (in the presser today) that at the start of the year they'd told Brett they'd talk at the half way point, at 8-3 it would be hard not to offer him an extension...not sure what else they could've done at the time.
We probably won't even get Ross100%
To be clear I just don’t want us begging Ross and ignoring everyone else.
Personally I don’t think Ross is the answer but wtf do I know?!
Wasn't it great going to the football believing you could beat anyone.I'd love a 17 win 5 loss season again. I know the goal is to win a flag, but just to be competitive would be fantastic.
Id be more pissed with nettlefoldI find that older people have memories of that duplicitous f#ck and young people are stupid and uninformed.
100%
To be clear I just don’t want us begging Ross and ignoring everyone else.
Personally I don’t think Ross is the answer but wtf do I know?!
View attachment 1536143
I guess we're "relevant" now?
Freo? No wayHave you actually looked at the lists he took over? Gringo would of led either team to finals!
You think it’s a good call to get tunnel vision amd beg a guy who hasn’t coached at any level in 3 years, hasn’t won a final in 8 years and hasn’t even said he wants to coach or has any ideas for us without considering any other options…I don't see how that is such a bad thing to do?
I mean if we don't do it, we set ourselves up to fail before we begin.
You think it’s a good call to get tunnel vision amd beg a guy who hasn’t coached at any level in 3 years, hasn’t won a final in 8 years and hasn’t even said he wants to coach or has any ideas for us without considering any other options…
Cool… I’m glad you’re not in charge of the process.
Can’t wait for the Pies to balance out next year.I want what Collingwood has.
On record he’s as good as any other coach that got to a grand final and didn’t win.I haven’t mentioned anything about the last 8 years . My original post was about sometime referring to him as a ‘serial loser’ and read also we need ‘a winner not someone who can deliver a bunch of runner up trophies’. I am calling out that view as narrow minded and if a bounce of the ball went the other way or Dawson gets a bigger fist to stop the toe poke etc he’d be viewed on the same bracket as a Roos or Longmire …
The fact it didn’t fall the way doesn’t make him less. His legacy is less but doesn’t change his actual coaching performance
That’s the only point I was making nothing else that you’re suggesting… I’ve got absolutely no idea if he would be good in todays world or if his style would translate that’s for better people than me to decide but the commentary that he’s no good because we didn’t win is just flat out wrong
Seems like we are talking about different things anyway so happy to leave it there