What compensation are we expecting for Chol. Is it end of second round i.e. same as Ellis or after our third round pick?
At best end of 3 but might be nothing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What compensation are we expecting for Chol. Is it end of second round i.e. same as Ellis or after our third round pick?
is he a ruck, a forward, or another Chol/CCJ that isn't dominant at either? I'd take him on the limited bits I've seen with the obvious caveats of not seeing his weak points or awareness of other issues.
Doesnt really matterWhat compensation are we expecting for Chol. Is it end of second round i.e. same as Ellis or after our third round pick?
id buy that. seems like a knob on the field.Apparently his off field is pretty ordinary.
Just because someone looks like a bit of a knob, doesn't mean they are one... Decent player at the right price.I don’t know James personally but his old man moved in similar sporting circles to me and he always came across as a decent bloke. I’d be surprised if James was as you put it, "a sh*t bloke."
I know Harmesy personally and he is a fantastic bloke .I don’t know James personally but his old man moved in similar sporting circles to me and he always came across as a decent bloke. I’d be surprised if James was as you put it, "a sh*t bloke."
At best end of 3 but might be nothing
Harmes, don’t mind that - good inside mid but starved of opportunity to play that role behind Oliver and Petracca
Im all for getting Tarrant because it such a huge and obvious need.but fmd list management and recruiting are the reason why we have to go out and get Tarrant at 32.You gotta laugh, some deadset drama queens in here.
Bit of faith in a list manager and recruiting team that have delivered 3 flags in 5 years
From what I can tell after quickly looking into it, he is best as a midfielder and wants to play as midfielder but is shuffled around. Some weeks will play predominately midfield other weeks HF/Midfield.
You can find out if he's coming to Richmond for us thenI know Harmesy personally and he is a fantastic bloke .
He's a great runner. Seems a waste to leave a high endurance player sitting on the bench.They play him defensive mid and get just 50% game time usually - subs off for long periods.
You can find out if he's coming to Richmond for us then
He's a great runner. Seems a waste to leave a high endurance player sitting on the bench.
Richmond is more important.Think Harmsey might be a bit busy on the other side of continent atm
No current season stats available
Yep they do but i live in wa and unlike most others around here try to only comment on what i know.Other states have footballers too.
I have long held the belief that wa kids are grossly underrated by the east for no other reason than they are mostly out of sight and out of mind the tyranny of distance eh.
It's a shame we won't get the chance to watch Vic Metro flog the pants off WA.Yep they do but i live in wa and unlike most others around here try to only comment on what i know.
Sometimes othe states other than victoria have better crops of kids coming thru.
By the way Unlike victoria footy in this state has been going on,you want a decent body of work to comment on then its the wa kids.
Amiss and Erasmus in particular are rated not just by wa people but everyone and Van Rooyen is touted as the second best key fwd going around by nearly everyone.
I have long held the belief that wa kids are grossly underrated by the east for no other reason than they are mostly out of sight and out of mind the tyranny of distance eh.
And leave Georgiades for Port after drafting two Victorians.Then Fremantle draft Cerra and leave Naughton for the doggies
Lol Grrr we are only better off going with Miller Nyuon and Brander if they are up to it. Cmon in all honesty how can you say with any sort of confidence that they are good enough.You mention a good draft hand and loading up for the future, how does a 33 year old factor in that. Loading up for a flag next year maybe, but if we are talking down the track then better off going with Miller, Biggy and someone like Brander i.e. a young discard.
Interested to know how many entire games you have actually seen him play ?Key could be his value.
I do not see Brander as a wingman. Too cumbersome for wing despite his movement, its all relative
He is almost like a tall that plays a little small for his height which really is not a good attribute possibly. So does he do enough in the air or is it simply a case of being pigeon-holed at West Coast? Has he been bluffed by West Coasts' situation/stocks?
He could be a bit of a inbetweener so his cost/value becomes critical.
He might be a bit of a hybrid, KPP/third tall or a very defined mid role at times only for his type.
So his value is his versatility, the role he could play and whether he could fit into RFC's player mix/set-up
Could he be a poor mans Bontempelli in terms of link play, not inside mid and support as a third tall/KPP?
At the moment we have 7, 15, 26, 28 probably 38 ccj, possibly 39 Chol, 40 and 44 Fmd if we use em all that really is loading up for the future while covering a huge list weakness in the short term with a proven player thru F/A.