Rumour 2023 Rumours and Speculation (Rumours total 33!, 1 BIG FISH ALERT last October 4th) (7 confirmed! 11 Busted!)

Will Clayton Oliver join the Adelaide Crows?


  • Total voters
    168

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't get it. That's obviously a joke?
What's not to get? Yes Jordan probably didn't physically headlock Nicks, but it's pretty obvious he had to convince the coach to switch him from defence to midfield by Nicks' own admission.
 
Dont worry BZT is not coming to adelaide. Would not want kelly either.

The only ones worth looking at with SA connections but are all contracted are ballard, cox, wilkie. Otherwise I would stick with what we have and focus on a ROB replacement (not grundy).

sounds like GC have put hollands on the table. difficult to price him you wouldnt want to pay more than a 2nd now but I'm sure GC think they are getting pick 7 for him.
Can't see anyway the club will be focussing on a ROB replacement with 2 years left on his contract and Strachan also contracted for the same period. The long term strategy re a ruckman should be to draft a young athletic ruck to develop and this is just the draft to do that with at least 4 that should be able to be picked up from the 2nd round on unless the recruitment team think Mitch Edwards is worth our 1st. Another mature age ruck should be way down the list of priorities. Speed, class and good ball users should be top of the list.

Ballard and Cox are but a pipe dream and Wilkie at 191cm is more an interceptor than a true KPD, mind you a very good one.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Dont worry BZT is not coming to adelaide. Would not want kelly either.

The only ones worth looking at with SA connections but are all contracted are ballard, cox, wilkie. Otherwise I would stick with what we have and focus on a ROB replacement (not grundy).

sounds like GC have put hollands on the table. difficult to price him you wouldnt want to pay more than a 2nd now but I'm sure GC think they are getting pick 7 for him.
Wilkie ain't ever coming back. Been looked after
 
Dont worry BZT is not coming to adelaide. Would not want kelly either.

The only ones worth looking at with SA connections but are all contracted are ballard, cox, wilkie. Otherwise I would stick with what we have and focus on a ROB replacement (not grundy).

sounds like GC have put hollands on the table. difficult to price him you wouldnt want to pay more than a 2nd now but I'm sure GC think they are getting pick 7 for him.
I haven't seen much of Hollands at AFL level that would suggest he's even worth a 2nd rounder. I'd do a straight swap for Hately, provide a chance to see if either one of them can do better in a new environment. But I suspect GC are only interested in draft points.
 
I haven't seen much of Hollands at AFL level that would suggest he's even worth a 2nd rounder. I'd do a straight swap for Hately, provide a chance to see if either one of them can do better in a new environment. But I suspect GC are only interested in draft points.
Last year showed heaps in the final few games of the season, this year has gone off a cliff. Worth a gamble imo but I wouldn't be giving up lots.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just checked the Pies and Bombers websites and Kelly is now a fair lump of a lad at 194cm 96kg and Zerk Thatcher 195cm 91kg.

Was there any talk about our interest in BZT before it was mentioned in the media Powa were keen on the former Sturt U18's player?
I dunno how people that live on this board 24/7 can not know this but there was a cryptic post mentioning the possible possibility of BZT coming to us last offseason (EDIT: and I don't think it mentioned a timeframe, meaning you can't rule out it was talking about this offseason).
 
Last edited:
For someone that contributes ZERO, how about providing some content besides whining about the content?
FWIW, give me his/her 'no content' over this futile, circular and, frankly, dull as **** argument about Dawson in the midfield.

You make it sound like you guys are doing us a solid by making us wade through this mire of 'content' just to find anything that basically resembles something that the thread pertains to.
 
FWIW, give me his/her 'no content' over this futile, circular and, frankly, dull as * argument about Dawson in the midfield.

You make it sound like you guys are doing us a solid by making us wade through this mire of 'content' just to find anything that basically resembles something that the thread pertains to.
It’s simple, discuss other stuff, it’s not up to me to post content that your happy with when you and others do **** all yourself.
 
FWIW, give me his/her 'no content' over this futile, circular and, frankly, dull as * argument about Dawson in the midfield.

You make it sound like you guys are doing us a solid by making us wade through this mire of 'content' just to find anything that basically resembles something that the thread pertains to.
To be fair it was all posted back in June, some have just chose to ignore it and carry on like it never happened.
 
It’s simple, discuss other stuff, it’s not up to me to post content that your happy with when you and others do * all yourself.
It's an internet forum - post whatever the **** you want.

I just wish you'd exercise that right in a thread that I can actively avoid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top