There might be a place for him on the wing... maybe. What worries me is that Gold Coast have been shuffling him around all over the field for year, trying to find a position that suits him, all to no avail. Now they're giving up and putting him on the trade table as a way out of their list & salary squeezes.Hey Vader - I think you and I might be on the same page for once here in terms of what Luko brings.
Lukosius is not a lot of things, be there is definitely a place for him in the 22.
The reason I said to name your 22 that didn't have him, was because I would have been surprised if you could find 22 better players to fill the spots from our list.
I think he will be a good addition and provide a receiver with an elite kick that we are desperately short on.
The debate is going to be around cost.
I think it is going to be interesting to see if we can land a midfielder BEFORE the draft. That will change a lot of my assumptions around what we would be willing to pay for Jack.
I have no insider view or confidence in what our club rates highly in terms of pick values - I'm sure that Nicks understands his position and will be pushing every button and pulling every lever to improve ASAP to try and save his skin. I think the prospect of a new draftee being the midfield hope in a few years time is not going to wash with the current staff.
Fully expecting us to trade in players that give a quick sugar hit rather than build us up for a proper premiership run.
We will see.
Oh, and just an observation ... drop the Fabio bit. It's not as clever as you seem to think it is, it's not going to stick.
While we have 3x tall forwards in TT/Fog/Tex, we do have a shortage of quality wingmen. Sholl is arguably the best of them, and he's not much chop either.
I'm not sure we want to be paying $1M for a wingman either...
... and I still think he's softer then butter.