- May 12, 2015
- 10,674
- 20,586
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
2 players lying prostrate for a significant period of time but no, nothing to see here, get back out there lads she'll be right
Ruddy joke
Ruddy joke
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ironic coming from a Collingwood supporter
Free Kick Ladder after Round 10:
We’ve also taken a look at the 50-metre penalties, which has been a hot topic in 2022.
Position Club Frees For Frees Against Differential 1 Western Bulldogs 247 192 55 2 Carlton 241 208 33 3 Adelaide 250 218 32 4 Collingwood 228 207 21 5 Melbourne 220 206 14 6 Fremantle 239 227 12 7 Hawthorn 226 220 6 8 Essendon 215 210 5 9 North Melbourne 231 228 3 10 Geelong 218 219 -1 11 GWS 209 214 -5 12 Brisbane 225 237 -12 13 St Kilda 218 232 -14 14 Port Adelaide 213 228 -15 15 West Coast 199 216 -17 16 Gold Coast 202 221 -19 17 Sydney 216 248 -32 18 Richmond 183 249 -66
Richmond has given away a massive 28, double the amount of the next
I thought it wss going to snow in the last quarter, it was that cold.Richmond have the biggest membership and lead in match day attendance. Seems about right.
Freezing midweek night. Low attendance is no surprise at all.
You mean like they do for Carlton every week?
Gee whiz these blues are up and about, don’t worry about us you just concentrate on getting over the bombers tonight. Have a funny little feeling you might be in for a surprise.Carlton gets frees because we're first to the footy.
Maybe your spud midfielders should have a go at putting their head over the ball.
Look forward to putting your mediore side in its place (again) next week.
We got the type of umpiring last night Oppo teams receive on a regular basis,how dare we?The fact that Richmond supporters are showing they always lose the free kick differential gives more credence to the fact they were completely favoured last night.
Any rate, I'm completely dispassionate about watching Port until the loser in the coaching box f.ucks off. Losing games against mediocre teams is a means to an end.
Realistically AFL is a rougher version of WWE ….The diverse umpiring last night always seems contentious when we are too close to the top 8. Happens year in & year out that in one critical game of the year we get the most diverse umpiring decisions. Ignore the freekick tally as they don't necessarily tell the true picture unless your the Bulldogs and expect an positive freekick differential week in, week out.
Look at the current ladder you can now see why the AFL is keen to get the Vic big 4 into the top 8 for September. St. Kilda is probably next in line to cop the wrath of the men in green so the AFL try to engineer an Wobblers vs Tiggers vs Carltank final at the G to fill the stadium & maximise TV ratings.
View attachment 1420791
We got 44000 to a freezing wet G on Sunday arvo and were roundly dumped on by SEN for having a poor turnout.Richmond have the biggest membership and lead in match day attendance. Seems about right.
Freezing midweek night. Low attendance is no surprise at all.
I agree, some of the media is going over the top - Tigers are playing just OK - but they are banking wins. Not sure who you think is going to belt them in finals tho - Sydney??The faff the VIC media are blowing there load on Richmond being back and playing the "old" way, is beyond a joke and very typical.
Port had no ruck and were a man and then some down for the last quarter and Richmond only just scraped past.
As a neutral, if anything that game showed Richmond have a long way to go before being back and if they play finals they will get belted playing like that.
Yeah. Sydnet on the SCG or at the MCG really, Saints at Marvel cuz you know, travel for Richmond. Richmond won't have a home elimination. So yeah. I back both of those teams to belt Richmond.I agree, some of the media is going over the top - Tigers are playing just OK - but they are banking wins. Not sure who you think is going to belt them in finals tho - Sydney??
Port weren't a player down - in fact they had a fresh player on thanks to the very rortable sub rule
You do realise that Sydney played Richmond in Sydney 2 weeks ago - I think the Tigers would think they let that one slip and would go in pretty confident in a final against Sydney and St Kilda for that matter. Melbourne, Bris and Geelong on the other hand would be toughYeah. Sydnet on the SCG or at the MCG really, Saints at Marvel cuz you know, travel for Richmond. Richmond won't have a home elimination. So yeah. I back both of those teams to belt Richmond.
Hahahaha it’s not our fault that deliberate is part of the rules
Different eras. Plus Riewoldt sacrificed a more prolific game for a team game. Out of the square like he was for his first four years he would have already been there.
CHF in an era without competitive defensive zones... as if Riewoldt wouldn’t have dominated with a paddock. Even at CHF. He also played in great teams nearly his entire career pumping up his stats.Kernahan played CHF for his first 5 years at Carlton....so you’re talking cr@p.
CHF in an era without competitive defensive zones... as if Riewoldt wouldn’t have dominated with a paddock. Even at CHF. He also played in great teams nearly his entire career pumping up his stats.
Yeah? And? Sydney were extremely poor in the first quarter and gave Richmond a 30 point lead. I don't think the Swans would let that slip again and would come out alot stronger.You do realise that Sydney played Richmond in Sydney 2 weeks ago - I think the Tigers would think they let that one slip and would go in pretty confident in a final against Sydney and St Kilda for that matter. Melbourne, Bris and Geelong on the other hand would be tough
agreed thenSydney were extremely poor