Coach Alastair Clarkson IV - HFC Racism Investigation Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

" Mrs. Smith and her night shift working husband moved in next door last weekend. She was much younger than him with long hair to her waist and........"
Imagine it these days as an online publication.

...with long hair to her waist and........ You will never believe what happened next. Click here to subscribe.


Mark Day used to drink at a pub near our place when a mate and I rented in East Malvern. My mate's GF used to play up a bit after a few drinks and with a bit of encouragement from Mr Day, she got about half way through a strip show on the table in the Dartmouth Lounge before the barman booted us all out. That was when he had the TV show too.

He didn't get booted though.
 
So pretty much it just boils down to this:

View attachment 1548645
Not exactly. The opposite in fact. The point is that truth is often subjective - and that's without bringing time, trauma, drugs, age or whatever other outside factors into it. George was full of shit and knew it.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Imagine it these days as an online publication.

...with long hair to her waist and........ You will never believe what happened next. Click here to subscribe.


Mark Day used to drink at a pub near our place when a mate and I rented in East Malvern. My mate's GF used to play up a bit after a few drinks and with a bit of encouragement from Mr Day, she got about half way through a strip show on the table in the Dartmouth Lounge before the barman booted us all out. That was when he had the TV show too.

He didn't get booted though.


Brother-in-law is mates with the son a former racing writer at the " Truth " ( now deceased )
He was asked to write for the " Balm " when they were short of stories.
 
Wait, so we have her truth, his truth, and their truth. Which our brains are telling each party that their memory of the truth, is the real truth.
And we therefore need to investigate this to see who’s truth is the truth, although it won’t really be the answer, as the other party’s truth, is their truth?

Can see this investigation ending smoothly…..
Quick, copyright this concept and submit it to Christopher Nolan.
 
Brother-in-law is mates with the son a former racing writer at the " Truth " ( now deceased )
He was asked to write for the " Balm " when they were short of stories.
There was Barry from Broadmeadows, Brian from Brunswick,
Brother-in-law is mates with the son a former racing writer at the " Truth " ( now deceased )
He was asked to write for the " Balm " when they were short of stories.
as a very young teenager my old man use to buy the truth every Thursday for the form guide he said. One day I discovered page 3 and heart balm I was hooked. My brother and I use to retrieve it from the bin when dad use to toss it out so mum wouldn’t read it. Those were the days
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Nah this sounds like the right approach
Except for the part where they want the AFL to independently investigate itself. Sounds awfully familiar to what we have now with this, which apparently isn't good enough. The AFL isn't going to have an acceptable proccess in place for a league wide review before this current investigation is supposed to start, so what happens then? To me this feels like a soft exit, as compared to Amy's hard one.

Don't get me wrong, I've wanted (and still want) the AFL to look into player welfare league wide and approach it from a systems point of view rather than an individuals one, but the cynic in me is absolutely screaming right now.
 
What does that even mean?

An independent investigation into how the AFL handles issues of racism. It's policies, procedures and practices. Not limited to Hawthorn.

It's an opportunity for genuine change, not just scapegoating a few people.
 
So now I’m totally confused - what exactly is the agenda.
Is it to claim an individual scalp - appears now that’s not the case. Is it to seek industry wide change - you would think so and that this should have been the approach from the start. Or do they also want monetary compensation. I really can’t follow what these families are being advised by their lawyers. If this is now the approach why did they speak to Jackson in the first place. The saving grace here is now the accused will put their story potentially without fear of reprisal. But who knows really what happens now………..
 
Just read the last few pages and have NFI of what you all speak of.

Who's blardy Ian? And why did the Hawks draft blardy Ian when even NMFC interviewed Ian and decided we wouldn't be getting Ian.

If Ian is who I think Ian is of course or maybe Ian isn't the Ian I think he might be. Maybe a totally different Ian

Crikey how in the heck will the great minds of the panel unravel this mess?
We're gonna spike their drinks with LSD.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Coach Alastair Clarkson IV - HFC Racism Investigation Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top