Prediction Changes v Melbourne (5 added to squad including Phillips, Cloke and Oxley omitted, see squad in OP)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Haha wow..

Playing 3 rucks when the game is actually faster with less stoppages.

Either Buckley and the selection panel are tactical geniuses or they have dead set lost the plot.

Unbelievable.
l think you will find till we start winning consistently there will some different selections from now on.
season properly over, so lets see who wants to play for us
 

Log in to remove this ad.

l think you will find till we start winning consistently there will some different selections from now on.
season properly over, so lets see who wants to play for us

What a load of shit. We have three winnable games and that will put us at 7-7. Finals are still a chance albeit with little or no room for error and the coaches and selectors will still be aiming for that. Just because some bigfooty random has given up doesnt mean the club has.
 
l think you will find till we start winning consistently there will some different selections from now on.
season properly over, so lets see who wants to play for us

Personally don't believe Buckley has the luxury of picking unbalanced teams just to see who wants to play for us.. we win 1-2 games for the remainder of the year and Buckley won't have a job.
 
I honestly hope they prove us wrong as I support Collingwood regardless.
However I have a bad feeling about playing these 3 in the same side.

I am actually baffled at a lot of the selection decisions these days.
Surely Brown plays instead of Frost?

THIS.
 
Personally don't believe Buckley has the luxury of picking unbalanced teams just to see who wants to play for us.. we win 1-2 games for the remainder of the year and Buckley won't have a job.
Correction...Bucks will have a job...but will it be at the Holden centre?
He has 2.5 months to salvage something from the season...the drums are beating in the distance.
 
What a load of shit. We have three winnable games and that will put us at 7-7. Finals are still a chance albeit with little or no room for error and the coaches and selectors will still be aiming for that. Just because some bigfooty random has given up doesnt mean the club has.
nice reply. l don't expect the club has totally given up, but they will be realistic to where we are. the way we are going and playing. do you really think we are better than the dees right now. l hope they give it all unlike last week. and if they go who knows. this random has not totally given up
but looking at it with sum reality
 
Personally don't believe Buckley has the luxury of picking unbalanced teams just to see who wants to play for us.. we win 1-2 games for the remainder of the year and Buckley won't have a job.
lot nicer and fair enough
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I hope im wrong but thats an awful looking team.

I just cant fathom the decision to play 3 rucks, not to pick cloke and to play frost over brown. Ill be happy to be proven wrong.

Bucks has his Favourites
 
Haha wow..

Playing 3 rucks when the game is actually faster with less stoppages.

Either Buckley and the selection panel are tactical geniuses or they have dead set lost the plot.

Unbelievable.

Cox won't ruck this week. He'll be a permanent forward. But I agree its a dumb selection decision which will leave us unbalanced.
 
I love the decision and I picked it, 3 up against Gawn, love it.. I'll be vindicted.

I like your positive approach. Depending on the conditions, there's potential here. Sure it makes us look top heavy and slower but that's the role of others. It poses the challenge for these three blokes to give us a significant advantage in the air. Witts will give us more in the ruck than Grundy and those urging a trade at the end of the season will be giving up a very valuable player. Just an opinion there's a chance I'll be wrong, but then I don't claim to know more about individual players and football in general than those currently in charge.
 
I like your positive approach. Depending on the conditions, there's potential here. Sure it makes us look top heavy and slower but that's the role of others. It poses the challenge for these three blokes to give us a significant advantage in the air. Witts will give us more in the ruck than Grundy and those urging a trade at the end of the season will be giving up a very valuable player. Just an opinion there's a chance I'll be wrong, but then I don't claim to know more about individual players and football in general than those currently in charge.

I wanted them to go with it. X 2 about not claiming to know more than those in charge. Nonetheless I still want to think of myself as astute. Reckon Witts v Gawn will be bigger than people think. BTW, Grundy averaging 18 disposals and his potential to play a Blicacs role may have had a baring on the decision.
 
I like your positive approach. Depending on the conditions, there's potential here. Sure it makes us look top heavy and slower but that's the role of others. It poses the challenge for these three blokes to give us a significant advantage in the air. Witts will give us more in the ruck than Grundy and those urging a trade at the end of the season will be giving up a very valuable player. Just an opinion there's a chance I'll be wrong, but then I don't claim to know more about individual players and football in general than those currently in charge.

I wanted them to go with it. X 2 about not claiming to know more than those in charge. Nonetheless I still want to think of myself as astute. Reckon Witts v Gawn will be bigger than people think. BTW, Grundy averaging 18 disposals and his potential to play a Blicacs role may have had a baring on the decision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top