- Mar 3, 2022
- 6,025
- 8,323
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Which part?Ya think? I'm not so sure about that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which part?Ya think? I'm not so sure about that.
While I’m not outraged that Hamill is out - like you, I’m not entirely convinced he’ll make it - but he’s been fine the last two weeks. Why yo-yo him in and out of the side? Why not drop an underperforming player like Smith or Jones and make them earn their spot back… it’s just yet another meh selection decision.Nicks is getting closer to realising who the muppets are. McHenry out is good as is Hamill (he wont make it).
Need Murphy and Smith out now.
I suspect that selectors wanted someone who could tackle Reid relatively comfortably, and Berry fits that build.How is Berry ahead of Dowling? They are clearly vying for the same position. Did we just not want to play Dowling as sub (assuming that’s what Berry will be)?
I didn’t want Hamill in last week, but he then blankets Hill, provides some good drive off half back and is then dropped for a tall? wtf?
If he could stitch up Hill, he is doing a good job. Saying that Berry is an exceptional tackler.I suspect that selectors wanted someone who could tackle Reid relatively comfortably, and Berry fits that build.
I was replying to the selection between Berry and Dowling. I was not happy that Hamill had been sacked again. If you go through my posts, you will see that I have been happy with how he has performed this year in our senior side. I was surprised when he was sacked the 1st timeIf he could stitch up Hill, he is doing a good job. Saying that Berry is an exceptional tackler.
WC forwards worry me.
The longer Shoenberg has been out, the better he has become.Schoenberg showed something in his first few years so deserve another chance to see if he can reproduce that after suffering Lisfanc, some with Hamill after his bout of concussions but then get dropped after playing his best AFL game for a while.
I know it is confusing for the cartel, so I will explain the selection of defenders for the last two weeks.
Against Brisbane we used Curtin as a medium/small defender. Logan Morris, in his second game, kicked two first half goals and Callum Ah Chee also chipped in kicking another two goals on Curtin. Not surprisingly he was subbed off and not selected last week or this week.
Last week Collingwood had one (very) tall forward in Cox/Darcy with De Goey (188 cm) acting as their main focal point. We had no need for another tall defender. The only medium/small defenders that we had available were Bond (has struggled in the SANFL), Hamill and Ryan. I would have been happy to see Ryan get a run but it was a big ask to have him play his first game at the MCG against the reigning premiers, matched up on the 2023 Norm Smith Medallist.
This week the Eagles are playing 3 tall forwards, Darling (191 cm), Waterman (191 cm) and Ryan Maric (196cm). We could use Hinge as an undersized tall defender but we need his rebound from half back. The only available tall defender not playing in the AFL is Borlase who has been solid in his AFL games this year.
The final option was to drop another medium/small defender and retain Hamill.
Michalanney - No Way
Hinge - You have to be joking.
Nankervis - We all love the Nank
That leaves Brodie Smith. He had a poor start to the season when he was unable to play with a bad back. His last two weeks back in the 22 have been much better so he gets the last defender spot.
There you are, it wasn’t that confusing after all.
Sure Smith has been improved the last couple of weeks but Hamill has also been fine. Why exactly does Smith automatically get the last defender spot? And you also didn’t mention Jones, who has been average to complete arse all season. Why doesn’t he come out? Dropping Hamill is fine - let’s face it, he’s unlikely to make it - but it’s still utterly blah.I know it is confusing for the cartel, so I will explain the selection of defenders for the last two weeks.
Against Brisbane we used Curtin as a medium/small defender. Logan Morris, in his second game, kicked two first half goals and Callum Ah Chee also chipped in kicking another two goals on Curtin. Not surprisingly he was subbed off and not selected last week or this week.
Last week Collingwood had one (very) tall forward in Cox/Darcy with De Goey (188 cm) acting as their main focal point. We had no need for another tall defender. The only medium/small defenders that we had available were Bond (has struggled in the SANFL), Hamill and Ryan. I would have been happy to see Ryan get a run but it was a big ask to have him play his first game at the MCG against the reigning premiers, matched up on the 2023 Norm Smith Medallist.
This week the Eagles are playing 3 tall forwards, Darling (191 cm), Waterman (191 cm) and Ryan Maric (196cm). We could use Hinge as an undersized tall defender but we need his rebound from half back. The only available tall defender not playing in the AFL is Borlase who has been solid in his AFL games this year.
The final option was to drop another medium/small defender and retain Hamill.
Michalanney - No Way
Hinge - You have to be joking.
Nankervis - We all love the Nank
That leaves Brodie Smith. He had a poor start to the season when he was unable to play with a bad back. His last two weeks back in the 22 have been much better so he gets the last defender spot.
There you are, it wasn’t that confusing after all.
You realise you've blown your cover with that post, don't you Nicksy?I know it is confusing for the cartel, so I will explain the selection of defenders for the last two weeks.
...
There you are, it wasn’t that confusing after all.
Only beat you by 24 minutessnap
(damn your ninja fingers )
He doesn't.Why exactly does Smith automatically get the last defender spot?
I blame my partner; she just got home from work and I was listening to the post-work stories breakdown.Only beat you by 24 minutes
+Just need Himberg back without dropping Burgess or Schoenberg so that we can roll out the fearsome Three-Headed Monster: Burgenbergberg.
Imagine if they were flatmates, having a BBQ.
Nice of her to give you the short version. The boss transfer part could have been 24 minutes alone.I blame my partner; she just got home from work and I was listening to the post-work stories breakdown.
Her boss is being transferred.
She had a good day (wasn't abused by Customers, always a good day).
Had a good lunch, freebie, and that's the 24 minutes right there.
Hmmm, Schoenberg is far better than McHenry imo.Ugh the Shoenberg selection stinks. We are going backwards
We currently have no selection integrity.Playing well has no bearing on selection
Likewise, playing poorly has no bearing on selection
I don't rate him due to his fumbling and lack of care with his disposal, but seeing as we're giving everyone else 4th/5th/23rd chances, we might as well give him another shot. Hopefully the penny dropped for him during his rehab - to come back from an achilles in that amount of time is a decent effort.Hmmm, Schoenberg is far better than McHenry imo.
Surely Hamill was a good choice for Liam Ryan this week...If he could stitch up Hill, he is doing a good job. Saying that Berry is an exceptional tackler.
WC forwards worry me.
Jones is playing on the wing. Imho he had the better of Lipinski last week.Sure Smith has been improved the last couple of weeks but Hamill has also been fine. Why exactly does Smith automatically get the last defender spot? And you also didn’t mention Jones, who has been average to complete arse all season. Why doesn’t he come out? Dropping Hamill is fine - let’s face it, he’s unlikely to make it - but it’s still utterly blah.
Schoenberg has had good games of AFL football.I don't rate him due to his fumbling and lack of care with his disposal, but seeing as we're giving everyone else 4th/5th/23rd chances, we might as well give him another shot. Hopefully the penny dropped for him during his rehab - to come back from an achilles in that amount of time is a decent effort.