- Mar 11, 2015
- 2,113
- 4,687
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Massive positive was the attack on the ball/contest for the whole game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or we could let ginbey keep developing in the position he’s going to play and not play Duggan where he isn’t very good.Duggan wouldnt be in there for his disposal, hes there to man the most damaging opponent mid. Hes going to get the ball whether hes at half back or mid, but as I said its not about Duggan.
Get the ball in Ginbeys hands, thats by far the easiest off half back
Ginbey to half back makes sense. A lot of mids come into the AFL as a half back or half forward, usually because the teams they come into already have a full AFL-level midfield. Whoever we draft with our first pick this year is not going to be a walk up start in the midfield next year because we'll be pretty set there.Or we could let ginbey keep developing in the position he’s going to play and not play Duggan where he isn’t very good.
When those players eventually get to play mid they still have to learn to play mid.Ginbey to half back makes sense. A lot of mids come into the AFL as a half back or half forward, usually because the teams they come into already have a full AFL-level midfield. Whoever we draft with our first pick this year is not going to be a walk up start in the midfield next year because we'll be pretty set there.
Nah cole is a decent small back with pace and hardness . Hough is not doing it alone .Hough is playing such a tough role. In a one pace backline that has and will concede alot of inside 50s... I trust it wont faze him, baptism of fire.. and just you wait fellas he will be a Sheppard type albeit not top 10 draft pick
Because he is an actual ruckman who can't be pushed off the ball .Why would Flynn be starting ruck over BWilliams.
My main takeaway from today was that Brockman was really good in the middle. Every time he went in there he seem to win a clearance for us or be involved
in getting first hands to the footy.
I don't think stallon is saying 'don't play Ginbey as a mid'. He'll still rotate through the midfield at times. I believe the suggestion is more about finding Ginbey a primary position that will help develop certain attributes.When those players eventually get to play mid they still have to learn to play mid.
Ginbey had a tagging role today in addition to winning his own ball.Maybe a bit controversial.
I'm not happy with the way Ginbey is being coached or mentored. Right now to me he is so focused on watching a player that he misses opportunities to win the ball. ( except funnily enough when he plays wing). when he often wins the ball in the contest he is very quickly looking for a give when maybe he could step and use his strength to hold up in the tackle. He often flays his arms and plays with his bodyweight off the ground.
Look he's a kid but when he goes on the ball just let him run at it like Harley. And obviously when they get more midfield options then play the kid wing, where he can use his pace.
Left footers always have that great deception side step...he doesn't have it because he just wants to get rid of it quickly. He needs to be able to play a more freer game or it's going to take 3 years before we see this kid gain more composure.
But developing his ball use off a half back flank isnt the same as developing his ball use in the contest. Duggan goes from being a 50/50 kick in the backline to being terrible as an inside mid. Its just not the same.I don't think stallon is saying 'don't play Ginbey as a mid'. He'll still rotate through the midfield at times. I believe the suggestion is more about finding Ginbey a primary position that will help develop certain attributes.
Flynn was bullied by draper today mate. Was pushed off the ball way more often than BWilliams. I rated the Flynn pick up but he has been worse than Bailey thus far.Because he is an actual ruckman who can't be pushed off the ball .
Clearly Flynn with Jack Williams is the superior ruck combo .
Need to keep bailey going to keep his trade value up
Its hilarious you rate Cole and want Witherden in the WAFL. Cole has been worse than Witherden this year.Nah cole is a decent small back with pace and hardness . Hough is not doing it alone .
100% I get that. But the focus is on Ginbey's development, not Duggan's role for the short term. All I'm saying is I get the idea.But developing his ball use off a half back flank isnt the same as developing his ball use in the contest. Duggan goes from being a 50/50 kick in the backline to being terrible as an inside mid. Its just not the same.
I do get the idea as well but I just dont buy that developing your kicking skills at half back makes you a better disposer in stoppages.100% I get that. But the focus is on Ginbey's development, not Duggan's role for the short term. All I'm saying is I get the idea.
Stop trying to make Ginbey HBF happen it's not going to happen. Ginbey has a shit kick. Deplorable kick.Ginbey to half back makes sense. A lot of mids come into the AFL as a half back or half forward, usually because the teams they come into already have a full AFL-level midfield. Whoever we draft with our first pick this year is not going to be a walk up start in the midfield next year because we'll be pretty set there.
You forgot Hough but I don't disagree with your point.Playing only Chesser, Ginbey, Brockman, Maric as 22 starters kills me. Hutch as sub. Oh man.
No eyes for the future.
Then we give these blokes ANOTHER go.....
Petch - the HFF version of Darcy Fogarty. Has the odd promising flash but never plays a 4 qtr game.
Jones - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
Rotham - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
Cole - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
B Williams - If he ain't first ruck he ain't better than a D grade player.
Why are we playing these 5 in the same team?
2 max, play kids. Give us something for next year.
Jesus.
Don't insult foggerty like that. I'd take him over petch any dayPlaying only Chesser, Ginbey, Brockman, Maric as 22 starters kills me. Hutch as sub. Oh man.
No eyes for the future.
Then we give these blokes ANOTHER go.....
Petch - the HFF version of Darcy Fogarty. Has the odd promising flash but never plays a 4 qtr game.
Jones - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
Rotham - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
Cole - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
B Williams - If he ain't first ruck he ain't better than a D grade player.
Why are we playing these 5 in the same team?
2 max, play kids. Give us something for next year.
Jesus.
What kids?Playing only Chesser, Ginbey, Brockman, Maric as 22 starters kills me. Hutch as sub. Oh man.
No eyes for the future.
Then we give these blokes ANOTHER go.....
Petch - the HFF version of Darcy Fogarty. Has the odd promising flash but never plays a 4 qtr game.
Jones - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
Rotham - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
Cole - Battler. Never lifts above a C grade player.
B Williams - If he ain't first ruck he ain't better than a D grade player.
Why are we playing these 5 in the same team?
2 max, play kids. Give us something for next year.
Jesus.