Certified Legendary Thread Sack Hinkley 12 - Finals Are Scary

[snozulu]

Our best list ever?

The list that finished the minor round top 4 in 3 of the past 4 years?

Funny how the narrative changes to suit the agenda and negate the true source of the issues.

 

[gbear]

Think of the mental toll us supporters have endured watching Hinkley stink it up for 12 years.

And many pay for the privilege!

 

[Enviable Tradition]

If Ken wasn't in the exit meetings we would have heard about it from the media by now.

Someone would leak.

 

[JimmyBC]

I like how the list will implode because Boak and Dixon are retiring. How will we ever cover for those two?

Instantly improves the list with those two has beens out the door if anything.

 

[longdonkey]

I really dislike the 'Ken can't play for them comments'.

There's a big difference to kicking to an open forward line vs kicking to a forward line with 36 players in it.

I always think that Ken knows no other way because he pretty much played all his footy like that. They would have bombed it into Ablett and Brownless and the year he played for Fitzroy it would have been Quinlan.

I've been told that Hinkley does not listen to other people or pretty much any suggestions at all so I figure that will be the way we always play.

 

[JimmyBC]

If one of our blokes can't get his missus up the duff I fully expect to hear WELL KEN CAN't DO IT FOR HIM!!

 

[PAFC Since 1870]

If Ken wasn't in the exit meetings we would have heard about it from the media by now.

Someone would leak.

Who is conducting his exit meeting? Sack Hinkley

 

[Papa G]

So Chewy316, if the board is divided, can you shed light on who's in which camp? Obviously Tredrea and Snowdon, the guys that actually understand the game of football ding ding ding are in the sack Hinkley camp, but I would be intrigued to know the loyalties of the others. Im sure the Bean Counter Oborne wants to keep him, Cardone probably does too because he's a Plant, but where are the others?

 

[MitchIn3D]

I've remained a BD member throughout but will stand out next year if he's still there.

So have I - I feel like I'm in the same position.

Could certainly use the money elsewhere.

 

[gbear]

Which is precisely why I think we should give Carr a chance to prove himself as coach, before writing him off. Josh will do things his way, but he can't do much until we get rid of Hinkley.

Just not 12 seasons if he can't make improvements after 3 or 4 seasons.

 

[Bump Bailey]

So Chewy316, if the board is divided, can you shed light on who's in which camp? Obviously Tredrea and Snowdon, the guys that actually understand the game of football ding ding ding are in the sack Hinkley camp, but I would be intrigued to know the loyalties of the others. Im sure the Bean Counter Oborne wants to keep him, Cardone probably does too because he's a Plant, but where are the others?

Surely Holly the disruptor is in the sack camp, it seems like a very disruptive thing to do.

 

[gbear]

I reckon it might get sorted this week but the AFL would really want the focus on the GF and lead up to it, Brownlow, parade etc.....

Maybe Friday? if it's a thing it will be Monday/Tuesday for sure next week.

The fact there has already been a 'walk away story' from Morris maybe makes me think something is up.

Fingers crossed eh.

6pm Saturday would work.

 

[JimmyBC]

FUKCIN' SACK THE CAMPAIGNER!! YOU ARSEHOLES!!

 

[Rexie J]

So Chewy316, if the board is divided, can you shed light on who's in which camp? Obviously Tredrea and Snowdon, the guys that actually understand the game of football ding ding ding are in the sack Hinkley camp, but I would be intrigued to know the loyalties of the others. Im sure the Bean Counter Oborne wants to keep him, Cardone probably does too because he's a Plant, but where are the others?

Columbus definitely in the Koch camp, so I suggest would vote accordingly.

 

[EskimoPAFC]

Surely Holly the disruptor is in the sack camp, it seems like a very disruptive thing to do.

She's so disruptive that she used a reverse agile methodology to actually disrupt her own disruption and thus wants Hinkley to stay.

 

[gbear]

I live for the day I refresh big footy and this title is changed to "Sacked Hinkley"

Look, the BF server will crash with all of us port supporters and the rest worrying that Port may actually achieve something in the near future as the spud will finally be gone.

 

[gbear]

Is Hinkley in the exit meetings Chewy316

No, this is what he is currently doing!

 

[Papa G]

Columbus definitely in the Koch camp, so I suggest would vote accordingly.

Do know much about Columbus? Seems a reasonably heavy hitter in the Oil and Gas space but I don't really know anything about him.

 

[Jello_B]

Ransom would likely be the type of board member that asks edgy questions, refers to irrelevant models to try and look innovative, and uses such a volume of consultancy terminology that everyone just switches off. I doubt she would ever make an informed decision on a matter other than which EAP we use.

 

[Chewy316]

So exit interviews for players have already started, is Ken involved?

I'm sure he is but it isn't going to impact his future with the club either way.

So Chewy316, if the board is divided, can you shed light on who's in which camp? Obviously Tredrea and Snowdon, the guys that actually understand the game of football ding ding ding are in the sack Hinkley camp, but I would be intrigued to know the loyalties of the others. Im sure the Bean Counter Oborne wants to keep him, Cardone probably does too because he's a Plant, but where are the others?

Quite frankly the majority of the Board members are probably not even aware of the discussions that are going to be taking place amongst the footy grown ups over the next few days.

It's a good question, but I can't answer it at this point. Not because I don't know it, but rather because I have my limits as to what I can and can't post in here.

 

[gbear]

FUKCIN' SACK THE CAMPAIGNER!! YOU ARSEHOLES!!

 

[JimmyBC]

Holly Ransom is a whacko you may as well have Tony Robbins on the board.

 

[gbear]

I'm sure he is but it isn't going to impact his future with the club either way.



Quite frankly the majority of the Board members are probably not even aware of the discussions that are going to be taking place amongst the footy grown ups over the next few days.

It's a good question, but I can't answer it at this point. Not because I don't know it, but rather because I have my limits as to what I can and can't post in here.

Is Koch involved in those grown-up discussions, or has they been relegated to the kid's table? I would prefer the latter!

 

[Chewy316]

Is Koch involved in those grown-up discussions, or has they been relegated to the kid's table? I would prefer the latter!

I suspect Koch will be the final person to sign off on any decision made about Hinkley's future in the coming weeks. But to my knowledge this is a discussion being made by football people, and Koch isn't a football person.

 

[PowerLil]

I suspect Koch will be the final person to sign off on any decision made about Hinkley's future in the coming weeks. But to my knowledge this is a discussion being made by football people, and Koch isn't a football person.

Hurry up! I'm not getting any younger.