You managed to read all that?WOW
And I get the odd comment on my sanity (or obvious lack of)
Posts like that make me feel rational, reasonable and boringly normal
Sack Janus
And take your mate ken with you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You managed to read all that?WOW
And I get the odd comment on my sanity (or obvious lack of)
Posts like that make me feel rational, reasonable and boringly normal
Sack Janus
And take your mate ken with you
Omg thanks now I have to explain why I just let out a massive burst of laughter while on the toilet.The definition of a troll must then be a post that provides a reasoned, researched, detailed, coherent recount, viewpoint.
Do you know what the 2003 & 2017 sides have in common? They didn't win a Premiership which is the only measurement of great sides, nothing else. Not %, wins where Hinkley wore a pink chesty bonds singlet, wins where Hinkley tied his left shoe before his right or any other ridiculous thing you need to twist the narrative to suit your "thesis". If you can't win against the top sides you don't win anything, hence where we sit after a decade of Hinkley.Surely I don’t have to explain that it’s relative to the percentage of other teams during the season? The 2003 side had the best percentage in the competition by some distance.
The 2017 side had the second best after Adelaide but it was decided after we got destroyed by them that we weren’t winning a flag, which is why we brought in guys like Houston, Bonner and Marshall after that game. As for us not beating anyone good...we lost to Geelong away by 2 points at Kardinia (the Dixon 30 second rubbish) - in fact, that bullshit game coupled with the fact that Geelong and GWS played a draw was the very reason why we didn't finish second (Geelong was s**t and would have been smoked).
Geelong - 15 wins 6 losses 1 draw - 62 points - 117.4%
Port Adelaide - 14 wins 8 losses - 56 points - 129.7%
Then again, Geelong would have dropped out of the top four if those two scenarios had happened, so we still wouldn't have beaten a top 4 team.
EDIT: Edited - confused 2015 season with 2017 based on Geelong and Adelaide playing in a draw - there were a number of teams that did so that year.
Are you trolling? Phil Walsh didn’t get killed in 2017 WTH, am I missing something here? Maybe that CERN collider is really creating alternate realities and merging them with ours
But there were no spelling mistakesThunderpants is stickerman
He meant to write Suck Hinkley.But there were no spelling mistakes
Ffs we are going to get stuck with him and miss out on ClarkoEddie reporting clarko firming for north while port wait for ken to walk
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
I have a feeling GWS or North wouldn't want a 10 year coach who hasn't made a GF - would we?
A pale imitation of Roby.
My favourite part was during the finals every year where he'd suddenly adjust the rankings so the teams that were actually doing well were up the top and then claim the rankings were flawless because they always correctly protected the top teams by the end of the season. A true master.Roby was a master. To commit to his Power Rankings for so long, with that unknown variable "umpire favouritism" as the lever by which he cycled teams up and down the rankings was just pure evil genius.
The idea that Ken can take a rock bottom club to mid table and finals and silly.
We were not ROCK BOTTOM in 2012.
There's a whole lot of context surrounding our NOT EVEN BOTTOM 4 finish.
He can achieve competitive results and probably improve a club with pieces already there. He could maybe even drop in to a side with a premiership caliber list and win a flag (before he starts to bend the list to his will), but I believe the idea that he can rebuild from rock bottom is not proven yet.
He'd be fine surrounded by good assistants & a playing group not subconsciously switched off to him like ours because he's been here for a hundred years.The idea that Ken can take a rock bottom club to mid table and finals and silly.
We were not ROCK BOTTOM in 2012.
There's a whole lot of context surrounding our NOT EVEN BOTTOM 4 finish.
He can achieve competitive results and probably improve a club with pieces already there. He could maybe even drop in to a side with a premiership caliber list and win a flag (before he starts to bend the list to his will), but I believe the idea that he can rebuild from rock bottom is not proven yet.
We were not ROCK BOTTOM in 2012.
There's a whole lot of context surrounding our NOT EVEN BOTTOM 4 finish.
hats off to Janus, he or she is one probably the best troll i've ever seen on big footy. The word elite gets thrown around too much, but it really is elite level of trolling.
Goodness me you are correct, my passion to expose this fraud is bordering on irresponsible.Well keep that quiet…
I come back to this the fact that past greats like Timmy G Cahill Fiacci Hodges are silent is shameful
It moved.Maybe they know something we don't?
My favourite part was during the finals every year where he'd suddenly adjust the rankings so the teams that were actually doing well were up the top and then claim the rankings were flawless because they always correctly protected the top teams by the end of the season. A true master.
He'd be fine surrounded by good assistants & a playing group not subconsciously switched off to him like ours because he's been here for a hundred years.