phantom13
Moderator
- Moderator
- #2,526
Don’t quote me if you’re not going to bother to read the context to what I posted and just shoot it down. I’ve made very very clear that provided there is some process then it’s fine.Can't read everything we are up to page 100+ already and this is equally my personal opinion
He is an exec he is one of if not the most important leaders at the club, and if you go by some of the whispers on here we have been doing things very quietly already and certainly the decision was kept extremely quiet.
Clarko would have been appointed by any and every club no matter the process - no panel would have dug up the stuff that ended up in that Hawthorn Report and Clarko like Ross would not consider entering into a public panel process to sell his credentials as a senior coach.
He doesn't need to prove he can do the job he clearly can and has. A powerpoint is not going to change his record. As I said do all the background checks and reference checks you need. Talk to the Freo guys who were put offside by him talk to Pavlich Mundy the Freo President at the time who ever he was make sure you know everything. But don't make him present to a trumped up panel alongside a bunch of rookies, that's not ruthless that's a sham for media consumption. Then make sure your vision is aligned on where the list is at and what the strategy is and what his role does and does not include. Maybe you are doing the same with Don Pyke who I am sure doesn't want to go through the public spectacle of these so called processes.
The last thing these guys want is to go through a public application in front of all the AFL media and get rejected even good assistants hesitate to do this more that 2 or 3 times because they worry about the damage to their reputation. Then you agree and announce your new coach.
All of this is still a process it is just a private process not a public show trial. Ultimately the board will make the decision they are accountable along with the CEO and GM of Footy Ops they are the only people who need to be convinced. Handing responsibility off to a Panel of experts is absolving yourself of that responsibility.
One thing that you’re wrong about is that he hasn’t proven he can do the job, or more accurately there is zero proof that he can do it now. That’s the bit that needs his presentation. What’s he bringing to the table? Cause you and the other Ross fan boys want to pretend that he’s still capable in spite of no evidence. In fact the most recent evidence that he’s any good is actually 2015 any time after that you’re either appointing a coach with a losing record who didn’t make finals or someone who isn’t coaching.
You wanna do that from a phone call and a chat go for it, I’d like a bit more rigour.