MRP / Trib. Tex vs MRP/Tribunal

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm not quite sure how it works but can a QC come in and bamboozle the Tribunal with lawyer talk. Surely the tribunal would have to be court mineded ,otherwise if they are just ordinary people surely they would just go on their gut feel and not really take into account whether or not the QC has made a good case or not
. If that makes any sense.

Yep, it happens quite a bit. The Collingwood/Carlton's of the world often send in lawyers.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yep, it happens quite a bit. The Collingwood/Carlton's of the world often send in lawyers.

we better have the QC booked just in case.

that being said, it is great to see the amount of hate for Walker on the main board, just emphasises what a talent we have on our hands.
 
At the end of the day the MRP are nothing more than a diversion, there job is expedite matters in a slapdash and cheapest way possible. Make the AFL work for it and pay for it and put it in front of the Tribunal where you can make submissions and pressure them into explaining themselves. It's usually in front of blokes with more clue and feel for the game and they weed out the inconsistent crap the MRP seems to create.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Watch it again it was blown when the ball spilt out.Then Walker dumped him,its a matter of how many.

I'm not arguing wether he is guilty or not. I'm offering suggestions to get him off. Let the club sanction him internally if they feel it was excessive.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. Tex vs MRP/Tribunal

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top