List Mgmt. 2019 Trade Thread - Part V

Remove this Banner Ad

My views based on current speculation and results.

Ability to bring talent in: A

Ability to get value for our talent: D-

Hopefully by the end of the day I’m happier. I guess I overrate our own

perception of value changes depends when upon the ladder the team is located.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

My views based on current speculation and results.

Ability to bring talent in: A

Ability to get value for our talent: D-

Hopefully by the end of the day I’m happier. I guess I overrate our own
I think you do.

Lonie last year, no interest

Newnes this year no interest

Acres, Young has got him involved in the Hill trade otherwise no interest.

DMAC no interest especially after that stupid extension.

Stuv, buggered

Bruce, the only one with currency.

Other currency, Gres, Billings, Marshall, King, Clark, not tradable.

We are paying for the sins of past recruiting.

Shit Acres was on 500k according to SEN.

Paying that for him? 95% SC is a joke.
 
How are we selling low and buying high?
Giving up acres for nothing after bringing him in with Pick 18

Hill was drafted for less than the dockers traded him in for which was pick 25. Which they got for the mayne compo.

We are now going to give up pick 10 plus a future 2nd plus stuv plus acres to get him

Acres going for pick 58 aka nothing. I get we are doing him a favor so that I'm ok with.

The reported Hill and Acres trades are junk. Massive overs. It can't be right.
 
You need it spelt out?
Jack Steven pick 58.
Bruce likely to go for SFA.
Acres -steak knives.

Hill 80% of the Tim Kelly value.
As annoying as the Steven thing is, seems like the club just wants him off the books so is happy to send him off.

The Bruce deal will get us Jones. People will have differing views on this but I like it since it will make our midfield better.

Acres is going for steak knives/nothing because he is worth nothing.

Yes we are overpaying for Hill, but thats what you need to do to get high quality, elite contracted players int your club.
 
Giving up acres for nothing after bringing him in with Pick 18

Hill was drafted for less than the dockers traded him in for which was pick 25. Which they got for the mayne compo.

We are now going to give up pick 10 plus a future 2nd plus stuv plus acres to get him

Acres going for pick 58 aka nothing. I get we are doing him a favor so that I'm ok with.

The reported Hill and Acres trades are junk. Massive overs. It can't be right.
So what were we meant to do with pick 6 and 59 this year?
 
Giving up acres for nothing after bringing him in with Pick 18

Hill was drafted for less than the dockers traded him in for which was pick 25. Which they got for the mayne compo.

We are now going to give up pick 10 plus a future 2nd plus stuv plus acres to get him

Acres going for pick 58 aka nothing. I get we are doing him a favor so that I'm ok with.

The reported Hill and Acres trades are junk. Massive overs. It can't be right.
We are also getting a 3rd, which is about what Acres worth.

Seems like a fair trade considering Hill is under contract
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You need it spelt out?
Jack Steven pick 58.
Bruce likely to go for SFA.
Acres -steak knives.

Hill 80% of the Tim Kelly value.


Overall the team and depth is significantly improved. The only player better than Hill in this TP is Kelly. Howard is potentially massive and I think Jines will have real impact on our game plan.

Cannot see how anyone can complain about this. We have potentially picked up 5 immediate 1st 22 players with pick 6, 59 and a future 2nd and Bruce. That borders on genius if it gets done.
 
Not that I mind losing Acres, but if Freo had already agreed to the deal, why would we then send a contracted Acres to them as an "add-on"?

Blacres apparently would have learnt $500K next season... wow.

I know our cap is in good nick but put that directly towards one of the recruits is good management.
 
So what were we meant to do with pick 6 and 59 this year?
I am ok with using 6 on Hill.

6 and 59 for 12 and 18. Big tick
12, 18 and future 3rd for 10, Howard, Ryder and future 4th. Big tick

Pick 10, future 2nd, stuv and acres for hill and a future 3rd is a fail. We've paid overs and then gone ahead and paid overs again.

Bruce for pick 32 would be a fail

Jones for a 2nd rounder if we value acres as a future 3rd is a fail
 
Overall the team and depth is significantly improved. The only player better than Hill in this TP is Kelly. Howard is potentially massive and I think Jines will have real impact on our game plan.

Cannot see how anyone can complain about this. We have potentially picked up 5 immediate 1st 22 players with pick 6, 59 and a future 2nd and Bruce. That borders on genius if it gets done.
Nail. Head.
We have killed it and improved our side whilst starting with peanuts. Any one who thinks otherwise will never be pleased as Joff said.
 
I am ok with using 6 on Hill.

6 and 59 for 12 and 18. Big tick
12, 18 and future 3rd for 10, Howard, Ryder and future 4th. Big tick

Pick 10, future 2nd, stuv and acres for hill and a future 3rd is a fail. We've paid overs and then gone ahead and paid overs again.

Bruce for pick 32 would be a fail

Jones for a 2nd rounder if we value acres as a future 3rd is a fail
Why?

Jones is a better player than Acres, hence why he is worth more in a trade.
 
I think you do.

Lonie last year, no interest

Newnes this year no interest

Acres, Young has got him involved in the Hill trade otherwise no interest.

DMAC no interest especially after that stupid extension.

Stuv, buggered

Bruce, the only one with currency.

Other currency, Gres, Billings, Marshall, King, Clark, not tradable.

We are paying for the sins of past recruiting.

Shit Acres was on 500k according to SEN.

Paying that for him? 95% SC is a joke.
AFL needs to remove the salary floor. It was ensures finals sides have an edge
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2019 Trade Thread - Part V

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top