www.afl.com.au
Pretty sure AFL suspensions come out at 5pm the next day so don't know if VFL follows the same timing
VFL are usually released on Tuesday mornings, sometimes Monday afternoons if they're "high profile" eg. Parker
Guess the MRO likes to put the tools down and have all the incidents on his desk on Monday morning
Apparently the tribunal declared “nothing to see here”.
Hasn't played a bad game yet. Lively and gets amongst it at every opportunity. KB does love a late improver. Wonder what his ceiling is likely to be? Hope we extend him.
Next year after we extend him.
Hope so too. Think it's only fair for a mid season recruit to be given at least another season to show their worth. Especially after uprooting themselves from another state. Unless they are out and out useless on the field (which he isn't) or a complete bell-end off the field.
Totally agree. Training attitudes go a long way to telling the story too. Problem is we didn't have a slot for next year so we'll have to wait until the retirements/delistings but I'm sure if he's going as well as it seems there will have been a whisper.
Yep, will have to delist/retire/trade out one more player than we bring in to get the list back to 44.
Wasn't late he's 18 was just injuries
Thanks mate , but surely the club can do better than thisClub review of the weekend’s game
Swans go down to North Melbourne in close VFL loss
After a slow start the Swans fought bravely to come within a five-point margin at the final siren.www.sydneyswans.com.au
I wasn't watching live at the time but the posts here made it seemed he had hit someone in the back of the head on purpose. So I went to the replay to have a look (36:20 in), and all he did was get someone in the back late. Clearly in the back and no high contact. A deserved 50m penalty was paid, and then another 50m, not sure for what but I assume dissent?. I don't see how that is ever a suspendable offence.
I think it was about the 2nd 50. The vision doesn't show it but the commentators were a bit bemused by his actions.
Good to see Vickory get acknowledged
Probably a small and a tall plays a half, or one or both left out completely, outside of the selected 23.
Hansen Jr being voted 2nd BoG is, unfortunately, not great for Indy Kirk - who is being played in the small defender role & was assigned Hansen last week.
He was good against Sandy live
I’m glad Kirk is being trialled as a small defender because I think it’s his best chance to progress. I was only able to watch the first and last quarters of the game last weekend as I had an event to attend but saw a)Kirk do some good stuff and b) Hansen look very dangerous. Given it’s probably the first time Kirk has been asked to play such a role I don’t think it was either great nor not-great for Kirk that Hansen was one of North’s best. He (Kirk) is a development player, not a ready-made, on-the-AFL-fringes player. It took Nick Smith several seasons to become the lockdown small defender he became. Not one game.
Agree that it did not deserve a sanction He basically got a huge shunt in the back from a NM player and cannoned into the other NM player. Unintentional, in the play and no harm done
Geez Vickery was very stiff to only get two IMO. I thought he was our clear best on the day.
