![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/hawthorn.png)
AFL app has 6 tackles
View attachment 2006720
Did you take that before the end of the game?
Mine says 9, and 38 touches.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join the Sweet FA and sign up for State Of Origin! Rivalry, Banter and New Friends made along the way in Bigfooty’s own AFL-Style simulated game. Everyone Welcome! -- Sweet Football Association - Since 2001 AD
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17 ⚽ Champs League 24 - Quals
AFL app has 6 tackles
View attachment 2006720
I didn't realise how many you had out though. Libba, Naughton, Weightman, Richards etc. Arguably bigger than Pendles, Checkers, Cox etc.Daicos is amazing (and I think Josh D is pretty underrated, he’s incredibly good too), and maybe I’m biased but that last quarter from the Bont showed why he’s the best player in the comp.
The Sydney mids are going well too, we saw what Warner could do first hand last week. But they need to do it for a while yet.
Today was concerning as it took that effort to get over what was half a VFL team, but there’s no doubt where the three votes go.
Bit rich coming from the supporter of a team that only has 3 good playersOk. So you are upset that I believe that the Bulldogs are not full of superstars and good players other than Bontempelli? Name me one other good player in the team then. I’d say the closest thing is Jamarra, but even he is not that good.
As for the last part of your post, ad hominem does not make your argument stronger. Usually people resort to ad hom when they are getting destroyed in debate like you are now.
Haha either way if both teams had their full list out there tonight, dogs would've won by a greater marginzyzzbruh I replied to Hippster who already mentioned Dogs outs... Stop trying to stir
10:48pm. You can see time on phone screenshotDid you take that before the end of the game?
Mine says 9, and 38 touches.
Bit rich coming from the supporter of a team that only has 3 good players
HighlyHaha either way if both teams had their full list out there tonight, dogs would've won by a greater margin
What about your boy Daicos then with only 2 tackles for the whole game?Treloar only runs one way. 3 tackles and 12 pressure acts. Bont had 6 tackles and 34 pressure acts.
2 tackles and 24 pressure acts. He runs both waysWhat about your boy Daicos then with only 2 tackles for the whole game?
Bit rich coming from the supporter of a team that only has 3 good players
Aged well.It's funny how we winning with the amount of injuries we have
Ok. So you are upset that I believe that the Bulldogs are not full of superstars and good players other than Bontempelli? Name me one other good player in the team then. I’d say the closest thing is Jamarra, but even he is not that good.
As for the last part of your post, ad hominem does not make your argument stronger. Usually people resort to ad hom when they are getting destroyed in debate like you are now.
I'd count 5 maybe 6 missing From the best 22 from Collingwood that could have impacted the result. Dogs were missing quite a few too plus were 2 men down early in the game. This just shows the dogs have slightly better depth than Collingwood. There 2s are undefeated so the squad bats pretty deep.Daicos is amazing (and I think Josh D is pretty underrated, he’s incredibly good too), and maybe I’m biased but that last quarter from the Bont showed why he’s the best player in the comp.
The Sydney mids are going well too, we saw what Warner could do first hand last week. But they need to do it for a while yet.
Today was concerning as it took that effort to get over what was half a VFL team, but there’s no doubt where the three votes go.
10:48pm. You can see time on phone screenshot
The next 50 might go a few years quicker I reckonIt's taken them 100 seasons but the Western Bulldogs have finally registered 50 wins v Collingwood in the VFL/AFL.
#HalfCentury
So just to be clear, you don’t consider Adam Trealor, Tom Liberatore, Aaron Naughton, Liam Jones, Jack Macrae, Ed Richards, Tim English to be “good” players? Because if that’s the case, calling you a village idiot is pretty generous it would seem.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
That just proves you can win with only a handful of good players just like the dogs. Too bad your outside 15 are a bunch of downhill skiing pretenders when the going gets tough.Those 3 players were massive in that EF last year
Cox and WHE make zero difference to you guys winning or losing. The others I'll agree with. Without Mihochek and Elliott the forward line lacked quite a bit of potency. Dogs outs just as significant plus were 2 men down most of the match.zyzzbruh I replied to Hippster who already mentioned Dogs outs... Stop trying to stir
That just proves you can win with only a handful of good players just like the dogs. Too bad your outside 15 are a bunch of downhill skiing pretenders when the going gets tough.
Treloar: no. I even mentioned before that I’d prefer Lipinski of the 2 and I think that Collingwood got the better deal of the leave / pick up situations.
Liberatore: no
Naughton: no.
Jones: no
Macrae: no, but by far the closest to a yes from the list you have provided.
Richards: no
English: no
You made the granny did you? A team that has spuds like Durdin and Owies never end up with premiership medals around their necks.The going gets tough finals?