- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,497
- 28,834
- AFL Club
- West Coast
You wrote out the 22 assuming Shuey will miss.
But if Shuey is fit and doesn't miss, how will the 22 look?
I was just messing with you mate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You wrote out the 22 assuming Shuey will miss.
But if Shuey is fit and doesn't miss, how will the 22 look?
Please write out the 22. I need to know.I was just messing with you mate.
what's the bet it's mcginnity in for shuey
Towering infernoThe Great Escape or Bullet?
Ropo doin alright , 5 goals the other week , had a few injury niggles last couple of years so when fit will be pushing for afl selection .So you think Barrass and RoPo are future AA's. Got it.
So you think Barrass and RoPo are future AA's. Got it.
With Barrass i wouldn't be surprised in 5 years if he was AA.
With Barrass i wouldn't be surprised in 5 years if he was AA.
Make it realistic? OK sure. The unfortunate reality is that there is no one we can bring in to stop the "carve-up" to which you refer. We don't have anyone currently waiting and ready to play that's going to make much difference whether we win or lose a match this year. We are going to get smashed by the good sides, lose to the average sides and beat up on the bottom four sides whichever fringe players we shift in and out of the side. We are clearly building for the future, especially in the midfield.This is why winning against poor sides is bad. We can't drop those who excel even though they are of little utility against better sides.
What is your suggestion for stopping the carve-up to which I referred? Make it realistic too, at least my suggestion was.
Is that because he's always giving them a touch up?I guess his opponents may be filing for a bit of "sexual Barassment" in the workplace, if you catch my drift.
But Lecca was initially a midfielder and was only turned forward once entering the AFL.Not everyone has to be a Gary Ablett type that transform into midfielders during their career
I wish the club would just play Hill and Lecras deep more often rather than trying to turn them into midfielders
I am no good at multi-quoting so I will just highlight the points to which I refer.Make it realistic? OK sure. The unfortunate reality is that there is no one we can bring in to stop the "carve-up" to which you refer. We don't have anyone currently waiting and ready to play that's going to make much difference whether we win or lose a match this year. We are going to get smashed by the good sides, lose to the average sides and beat up on the bottom four sides whichever fringe players we shift in and out of the side. We are clearly building for the future, especially in the midfield.
If you'd bothered to read my post properly I said I was all for phasing Butler out, unless he suddenly plays every match like he did on the weekend. Consider it from Simpson's point of view though when he's selecting a side for this week, do you really think he's going to drop the player who was arguably the best on ground from the last game? That would be a quick way for him to lose the trust and respect of the rest of the team, especially the young players.
Then we come to your suggestions, no problems with bringing Bennell back and blooding Waterman, but dropping Butler? You talk about being realistic but why the hell would the match committee drop someone who played a great game the week before? And banging on about playing well against poor teams, got some news for you there, most of our players do the same thing. We've got plenty of players who've played poorly against both good and bad teams all season, McGinnity being one of them, why drop someone who's at least shown something?
As for my changes, if Shuey is out then I'd probably go similar to yours in so far as -
Out - Shuey, Masten
In - Bennell, Waterman
Duggan gets a full game
But for mine, McGinnity would never see the field in an Eagles uniform again.
Is that because he's always giving them a touch up?
Yep fair enough, but we're talking about changes for the next game. In the long term I agree that we need to phase/trade out more of the players of the Butler/Masten/Rosa/Selwood and dare I say it, Priddis ilk and replace them with quality young players if we're to compete. As you say we'll have to agree to disagree on McGinnity, he does play with heart but he has absolutely no skill to back it up with. I can see where you're coming from with him but we need someone more like Chick, hard as nails, but actually acts like he's seen a football before when he does get it.I am no good at multi-quoting so I will just highlight the points to which I refer.
I agreed with you and then said this is the problem. We aren't picking a team for the team we are playing, nor do we use the sub to our advantage; we pick a team based on false positives which we all lament each and every week (e.g. see thorne89 and musings about battering minnows so the midfield all keep their spots; an opinion with which I wholeheartedly agree). Butler should stay on the back of the performance against Brisbane, but should he stay? That's the question. In my view no, but I am not the MC, purely an opportunistic BF poster.
I was more referring to calls such as 'bring in Colledge, Karpany and Barrass'. We know that is not going to happen based on logic and our MC's form.
'Most', yes but not all. Hill was good against Freo. McGinnity was shit, sure, but he has been okay and done the job he was given in the first few weeks. I simply think his brand of toughness and unskilled disposal could be useful in the upcoming match. I am not endorsing him as an All-Australian who should play every game, to be clear.
It appears apart from McGinnity we are have bilateral consensus. Agree to disagree. Thanks for the good posts too.
He loves getting the fist in too!!I guess his opponents may be filing for a bit of "sexual Barassment" in the workplace, if you catch my drift.
I see your point with Mcspudity , because Gws are gonna run run run with pace , he probably will come in if someone sore or injured over colledgeI am no good at multi-quoting so I will just highlight the points to which I refer.
I agreed with you and then said this is the problem. We aren't picking a team for the team we are playing, nor do we use the sub to our advantage; we pick a team based on false positives which we all lament each and every week (e.g. see thorne89 and musings about battering minnows so the midfield all keep their spots; an opinion with which I wholeheartedly agree). Butler should stay on the back of the performance against Brisbane, but should he stay? That's the question. In my view no, but I am not the MC, purely an opportunistic BF poster.
I was more referring to calls such as 'bring in Colledge, Karpany and Barrass'. We know that is not going to happen based on logic and our MC's form.
'Most', yes but not all. Hill was good against Freo. McGinnity was shit, sure, but he has been okay and done the job he was given in the first few weeks. I simply think his brand of toughness and unskilled disposal could be useful in the upcoming match. I am not endorsing him as an All-Australian who should play every game, to be clear.
It appears apart from McGinnity we are have bilateral consensus. Agree to disagree. Thanks for the good posts too.
A 2006 Chick would be just what we need. Priddis can stay (he is useful to the young blokes on how to put your head over it!) but should be relegated to playing the role he was always intended for, e.g. 4th or 5th best mid who accumulates then disposes to the guys who can actually kick it end-over-end to a team mate. He was another who was good(ish) against the lions apart from a few characteristic turnovers who will get praise for being our gun.Yep fair enough, but we're talking about changes for the next game. In the long term I agree that we need to phase/trade out more of the players of the Butler/Masten/Rosa/Selwood and dare I say it, Priddis ilk and replace them with quality young players if we're to compete. As you say we'll have to agree to disagree on McGinnity, he does play with heart but he has absolutely no skill to back it up with. I can see where you're coming from with him but we need someone more like Chick, hard as nails, but actually acts like he's seen a football before when he does get it.
Would prefer both Sheed and Duggan to play full games. Priddis will never be sub, but as my previous posts suggest more responsibility should be given to the young blokes to lead, after all.. isn't that what we drafted them for? Masten could be handy off the bench late in the game.I see your point with Mcspudity , because Gws are gonna run run run with pace , he probably will come in if someone sore or injured over colledge
Who wants Karpany . He hasnt even played a good wafl league game yet. Lots of calls for Duggan to play a full game , I agree , Sheed could be sub .
I have seen GWS a few times they have pace and skill. Does College have any pace, he is described as prone to turnovers by many. In the one AFL appearance I have seen him in he looked very slow both running and in a football senseOut: Masten
In: Colledge
Butler McGovern Sheppard
Hurn Schofield Rosa
Duggan Priddis Gaff
Wellingham McInnes Cripps
LeCras Kennedy Hill
Ruck: Natanui Yeo Shuey
Int: Lycett Sheed Nelson Sub: Colledge
...mmm....So Steve McQueen = Josh Hill?
Fascinating.