What's worse overachieving or underachieving? North might have a solid list but they're still on the waiting list for a replacement heart.
Dunno but we havn't lost three in a row by a combined 160 points. Demonstrates lack of heart as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What's worse overachieving or underachieving? North might have a solid list but they're still on the waiting list for a replacement heart.
Hardwick inherited a list with a host of young stars and high draft picks waiting to break out. Cotchin, Deledio, Riewoldt, Rance, Vickery. He didn't exactly have it too bad.
Ok, so has our rebuild failed?
Did we even have a rebuild?
Or is this thread complete and utter shit?
Essendon were never in a rebuild.
Youngest Essendon teams since 1979 under Knights = rebuild.
So let me get this straight. No Richmond supporters are allowed to start threads about opposition teams, am I right?Wow. This thread is so full of stupid.
I would have thought the Tiges supporters would have outgrown their inferiority complex by now. Hardwick's done well, folks. Time for the big boy pants! No need to cheer other teams' failure - you can finally cheer your own team's success!
As for the Bombers, i think their performances this year given their off-field distractions have been nothing short of miraculous. Furthermore their fade-out came about 6 weeks later this year than last. So even ignoring the ASADA mess, progress is being made.
Wow. This thread is so full of stupid.
I would have thought the Tiges supporters would have outgrown their inferiority complex by now. Hardwick's done well, folks. Time for the big boy pants! No need to cheer other teams' failure - you can finally cheer your own team's success!
As for the Bombers, i think their performances this year given their off-field distractions have been nothing short of miraculous. Furthermore their fade-out came about 6 weeks later this year than last. So even ignoring the ASADA mess, progress is being made.
I love these kinds of threads,
Three losses in a row and it's a 'failed rebuild'
Keep it up, 33 years
Just because a young team were played, doesn't mean it was a 'rebuild.' A majority of that list is still there.
Wow. This thread is so full of stupid.
I would have thought the Tiges supporters would have outgrown their inferiority complex by now. Hardwick's done well, folks. Time for the big boy pants! No need to cheer other teams' failure - you can finally cheer your own team's success!
As for the Bombers, i think their performances this year given their off-field distractions have been nothing short of miraculous. Furthermore their fade-out came about 6 weeks later this year than last. So even ignoring the ASADA mess, progress is being made.
3 losses by a combined 160pts. Thats very concerning. Plus falling short in August yet again.
Like the heart you displayed in last years elim?Dunno but we havn't lost three in a row by a combined 160 points. Demonstrates lack of heart as well
And swallowed up by silly people on BigFooty.The myth of June/July fade outs was pushed by media
Do any threads on the main board not turn into shitfights.
Hawks/Geelong/Sydney
Essendon/Richmond
WCE/Freo
etc etc
And yet we're still firmly entrenched in the 8 with this whole ASADA investigation having no doubt devastating effects on the playing group.
I'd be more concerned about round 23, especially considering your sides performance the last time we met. Could be the difference between playing a very poor side with a failed rebuild, or a side from Adelaide with a genuine shot at a flag.
The bandwagoners have awoken after 33 years of a abysmal football
Players farewelled in the post-season 2007-09: Lloyd (270), Lucas (270), Hird (253), Camporeale (252), Michael (238), M.Johnson (194), J.Johnson (184), Heffernan (170), McPhee (167), Peverill (144), Ramanauskas (134), Bolton (124), Lovett (88), Cole (63), Laycock (58), Bradley (49), Nash (43)
New players: Bellchambers, Hurley, Zaharakis, Carlisle, Crameri, Howlett, Myers, Pears, Melksham, Hooker, Colyer, Hardingham, Slattery, D.Daniher, Quinn, Marigliani, Magin, J.Williams, Atkinson plus M.Williams, Prismall, Skipworth from other clubs
Games played prior to Knights: Hocking (1), Lonergan (1), Neagle (1), Reimers (3), Hislop (3), Jetta (4), Houli (4), Gumbleton (5), Dempsey (6), Davey (14), Johns (19)
Rebuild.
Well, I think it's pretty easy to see why we have dropped off this year and last year. 2011 we lost Jobe for a few games in the back half half of the season and didn't yet have the depth to properly cover him, but we didn't finish the season off that badly (won three of the last five). Under Knights in 2010 we were a complete and utter shambles to finish the year, and the players had given up on him. 2009 we snuck into finals with a negative win/loss ratio. Before then, we just weren't a very good team.Thread asking about the 'failed rebuild' is utter shit. Essendon were never in a rebuild. They were just a team going from 5th-8th to top 4. Even under Knights they were in this set. The question should be 'How come Essendon haven't taken the next step?' Or 'Why do Essendon continue to drop off at the end of the year?' They have the list to be contenders, but always seem to drop off quite badly. Of course, these last two seasons have been tainted with issues. The difference this season is that their injury list isn't nearly as bad as last seasons, yet they are dropping off in a similar way.
Well, I think it's pretty easy to see why we have dropped off this year and last year. 2011 we lost Jobe for a few games in the back half half of the season and didn't yet have the depth to properly cover him, but we didn't finish the season off that badly (won three of the last five). Under Knights in 2010 we were a complete and utter shambles to finish the year, and the players had given up on him. 2009 we snuck into finals with a negative win/loss ratio. Before then, we just weren't a very good team.
Under Knights we were also the worst traveling team in the AFL; we seriously could not win on the road, so that would account for a few more 2nd half of season loses. Hird has turned this around beautifully.
Besides, being a big 4 club, we usually have to play all of Carlton/Collingwood/Richmond in the back half of the year, and no matter where our respective clubs are at at that point, these matches are always a toss of the coin.
Our late season fadeouts are a problem for sure, but I think we can be excused for the last two years. It does need to change if we want to take the next step.
Well, I think it's pretty easy to see why we have dropped off this year and last year. 2011 we lost Jobe for a few games in the back half half of the season and didn't yet have the depth to properly cover him, but we didn't finish the season off that badly (won three of the last five). Under Knights in 2010 we were a complete and utter shambles to finish the year, and the players had given up on him. 2009 we snuck into finals with a negative win/loss ratio. Before then, we just weren't a very good team.
Under Knights we were also the worst traveling team in the AFL; we seriously could not win on the road, so that would account for a few more 2nd half of season loses. Hird has turned this around beautifully.
Besides, being a big 4 club, we usually have to play all of Carlton/Collingwood/Richmond in the back half of the year, and no matter where our respective clubs are at at that point, these matches are always a toss of the coin.
Our late season fadeouts are a problem for sure, but I think we can be excused for the last two years. It does need to change if we want to take the next step.
Disagree. If anything, they started their rebuild under Sheedy in 2006 and finished in Knights first year when they made finals. As I said, a majority of that list is still there. A majority of the players you mentioned were gone before Knights got there, with the exception of Lloyd. The rebuild started before he got there. He believed the team could make finals, which the board agreed with, effectively ending the 'rebuild.' If a team can make finals, then they can build on areas they need to, not start from the bottom which would be a rebuild. Since Knights first year, Essendon have believed they can make finals. I wouldn't call that a rebuild.