Oppo Camp Non Geelong football (AFL) discussion 2024, Part I

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want logically want Brisbane to win because they are more beatable and finishing above gws would be good.

But everytime the ball is in dispute I instinctively want Brisbane to lose the one on one.

Very hard to stay emotionally consistent
It is better for us if Bris win but they are flogs and i rather like GWS
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I want logically want Brisbane to win because they are more beatable and finishing above gws would be good.

But everytime the ball is in dispute I instinctively want Brisbane to lose the one on one.

Very hard to stay emotionally consistent
The taste of top 2 chances firming up is too good to ignore. Brisbane finishing as high as 4th this year also wouldn't bother me.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Forward Harry Jones was subbed off in the final quarter after a head collision with Darcy Cameron and was left bleeding profusely from his nose. Jones was cleared of any facial damage, but coach Brad Scott was moved to once again call for the removal of the sub role.

The thrilling final moments between Essendon and Collingwood in round seven
"He's fine and no concussion, they cleared him. But it's such a difficult one, because they have to assess him. We had 16 minutes to go in the last quarter, and they had to assess him, so we just made the call, take your time, we'll sub him, because we don't have time to wait," Scott said.

"It's one of those frustrating (ones) – I've been pretty vocal, I don't know why we have a sub. I've got absolutely no idea. If we didn't have a sub, we wouldn't have to worry about rushing the doctors to get a concussion diagnosis or not, we'd just put the fresh player on who's sitting there.

"But then we're sitting there with the fresh player, while we're assessing a key forward, while the game is on the line. The sub's supposed to take the pressure off the doctor? I'd love someone to explain that to me, I've got no idea.

"Five or four (on the bench, instead of), a sub? We brought back the rule everyone hated."

Weirdest rant in a while. He'd prefer we would go back to four on the bench and they would just play a man down instead :think:
 
How about just 5 on the bench no sub
We need a concussion sub. Only used for a concussion. Clearly a different player every week. Also comes off again if player passes test.
5 on the bench is fine
 
We need a concussion sub. Only used for a concussion. Clearly a different player every week
5 on the bench is fine
If we have a concussion sub the same problem will happen

Coaches will bitch about being a man down due to a hammy/rib etc and they can't sub whilst the other team subbed a concussion and the AFL will bend and make it a sub for any injury. Then coaches will bitch that they didn't get to use the sub whilst the other side did due to injury which gave them a fresh player and the AFL will bend letting them use the sub for anything...... Repeat for ever

Just make it 4 or 5 or whatever number on bench and deal with it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top