Preview R14: Changes vs. Sydney Swans

Remove this Banner Ad

Looks like Tex isn't ready & not worth risking... so continue using Borlase up forward & Jones gets a reprieve as a defender.

B: Laird, Butts, Hamill
HB: Michaelanny, Keane, Hinge
C: Sholl, Soligo, Nankervis
HF: Schoenberg, Fogarty, Pedlar
F: Cook, Borlase, T Murray
I: Jones, Taylor, Curtin, Dowling
Sub: Berry

Tex, N Murray & Rankine to return after the bye...
Tex was very close to getting up for the Richmond game, he said himself the back was recovering far better than earlier this season and he looked fine in our last training session. He'll play against Sydney.
 
Tex was very close to getting up for the Richmond game, he said himself the back was recovering far better than earlier this season and he looked fine in our last training session. He'll play against Sydney.
Given some of his performances under duress this season, why risk him when there is a bye the following week?

Would prefer to get him right & he plays on next season

Nothing much to be gained by playing him.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In: Rankine, Murray, Cook? Pedlar, Curtin, Taylor, Edwards.......ROB - get your eyes sorted out lad.
Out: Strachaun(inj) McHenry, Burgess, Keays, Murphy, Smith, Schoenberg.

On what Earth do we play Nick Murray 2 games in the SANFL?
Does Rankine now come back through the 2's?

We wouldn't know the way forward even if the light at the end of the tunnel was turned on!
Flaming On Fire GIF

Nothing to see here. Everything's under control.
 
Given some of his performances under duress this season, why risk him when there is a bye the following week?

Would prefer to get him right & he plays on next season

Nothing much to be gained by playing him.
Because we pick the team to win this week. If he can play he'll play.
 
Given some of his performances under duress this season, why risk him when there is a bye the following week?

Would prefer to get him right & he plays on next season

Nothing much to be gained by playing him.
Why would there be any risk? If the back has recovered, he's just as likely to get a back spasm picking up his kids again as he is on a footy field. The cautious approach was not playing him against Richmond.
 
Why would there be any risk? If the back has recovered, he's just as likely to get a back spasm picking up his kids again as he is on a footy field. The cautious approach was not playing him against Richmond.
How many times has he had this back injury reoccur this season?

Why risk this week, when you can effectively give him another 2 weeks?

Gives someone else an opportunity & more important Tex plays on next season than getting games into him this season.
 
Because we pick the team to win this week. If he can play he'll play.
You think the primary focus for the remainder of the year is winning?

Seriously?
 
Given some of his performances under duress this season, why risk him when there is a bye the following week?

Would prefer to get him right & he plays on next season

Nothing much to be gained by playing him.
A couple of "ifs" but with the season shot and Tex starting to get "old warhorse" injuries, do we think a retirement announcement will happen soon with an appropriate home game send off?
 
A couple of "ifs" but with the season shot and Tex starting to get "old warhorse" injuries, do we think a retirement announcement will happen soon with an appropriate home game send off?

Based on the club refusing to talk to Sloane about retirement, the decision would fall on Tex and the day he chooses to retire, we will probably asking him to hold the announcement until the last home game for the season. I don't mind that. However, he would actually do the list a service by retiring mid season with Brodie Smith so we can prepare for next season and experiment with our forward structure.

Knowing Nicks though Dawson is probably secretly training to be our Tex replacement.
 
Are you poor at reading sarcasm? The poster you quoted is just quoting what Kelly, Silvers and Nicks have said in recent days about still picking the team to win that week.
There is an emoticon for where it's not obvious! ;)

You were being serious though!

More important for Tex to play next week or next season?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

There is an emoticon for where it's not obvious! ;)

You were being serious though!

More important for Tex to play next week or next season?
Next season, I just said I'm confident he'll play given the club will be desperate for a win against a good opponent to take some heat off them. Also 4 weeks for Rankine by the time of our next game, I again doubt they'll leave out our best player if he's fully recovered given where our season is at.
 
Next season, I just said I'm confident he'll play given the club will be desperate for a win against a good opponent to take some heat off them. Also 4 weeks for Rankine by the time of our next game, I again doubt they'll leave out our best player if he's fully recovered given where our season is at.
But what is the point in risking quality players when our season is cooked

I could understand if we were making finals... but we are not!

We need to be playing our best young talent not risking injured players when there is nothing on the line.
 
Nah, reckon he goes on one more. Heavily managed next year like Hawkins at Geelong.
Sadly, I think this year will be it, given there doesn't appear to be much hope of us playing finals next year.
 
Based on the club refusing to talk to Sloane about retirement, the decision would fall on Tex and the day he chooses to retire, we will probably asking him to hold the announcement until the last home game for the season. I don't mind that. However, he would actually do the list a service by retiring mid season with Brodie Smith so we can prepare for next season and experiment with our forward structure.

Knowing Nicks though Dawson is probably secretly training to be our Tex replacement.
Since posting, I've looked at our fixture and I think Tex would want to stay until the round 22 showdown (which is Port home game). The following week we finish our year in Sydney. Doesn't seem right for Tex to retire one game before a showdown.
 
In: Rankine, Murray, Cook? Pedlar, Curtin, Taylor, Edwards.......ROB - get your eyes sorted out lad.
Out: Strachaun(inj) McHenry, Burgess, Keays, Murphy, Smith, Schoenberg.

On what Earth do we play Nick Murray 2 games in the SANFL?
Does Rankine now come back through the 2's?

We wouldn't know the way forward even if the light at the end of the tunnel was turned on!
why would Rankine come back through the 2s?

And of course Murray has a stint in the SANFL after an ACL. that’s smart management

Your ins and outs are spot on though. Team instantly looks more exciting.
 
C7 said last night that Staunie might be available. We surely could drop him after one match, but this is Adelaide I suppose, who knows.
 
Well our choices are a guy who brings no leadership at all, makes terrible decisions, can't mark the ball, struggles to kick and handball or the guy who can't ruck at all and has little positive or negative influence
Mutineer thinks ROB is an absolute gun ruckman..

But he also thinks laird, crouch, mchenry, murphy and keays are guns too.. and he defends this lot endlessly.

So Mutineers opinion really shouldnt be taken seriously.

Strawnie, before he got injured, showed more against the tigers on Thursday than that unco buffoon ROB has shown all year..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview R14: Changes vs. Sydney Swans

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top