
It's been a long dry spell.We shouldn't be relying on injuries to beat opposition sides.
We want to be tested against their best line-up.
It's 3 am at the club. I'm not being too fussy about what I can get.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 2
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
It's been a long dry spell.We shouldn't be relying on injuries to beat opposition sides.
We want to be tested against their best line-up.
I thought hinge was in our best 10
Why?We shouldn't be relying on injuries to beat opposition sides.
We want to be tested against their best line-up.
To see where we are at.
Exactly.Who gives a shit where we are at round 1. Let's get the 4 points and move on.
We shouldn't be relying on injuries to beat opposition sides.
We want to be tested against their best line-up.
This!
If all Tex can do these days is provide a CHF style linking role that nets him 3 kicks, 2 marks and 7 Hb then i think the games gone past him. The harsh reality is we want to push our best younger players into this team and I am not sure absorbing Tex into a mediocre half cocked role best serves us because that kills our flexibility and if we are relying on subbing him then he is cooked.
I just hope we can provide entertainment for the crowd this week, that's all that really matters at the end of the day. It'll feel like a win regardless then!Relying on and taking advantage of are two different things. If it moves a 50-50 game to 60-40 our way we'll take it and run.
We're going to have injuries at some point. We might lose a game or two because Dawson or Rankine are injured. It's only fair to make hay while the sun shines for us.
It's like when people say "We only won because the opposition missed/shit the bed/lost a player/etc". Who cares. The 4 points count the same. We're not England, moral victories aren't worth any more points.
The Saints also conceded their highest score under Ross in this 2nd stint as coach and had access to most of their first choice defenders (a strength of theirs). Kicking a big score like that against the Saints is a good sign, regardless of their outs in the forwardline (who they struggle to kick big scores with anyway).Tex will take the best or second best defender most weeks still - the weeks he doesn’t then that’s when we should go to him more. I wouldn’t take too much out of the Saints game - they were pretty poor, we dominated centre clearance - and Tex played further up the ground.
We need to make a good finals run this year and Tex will win us games along the way
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
In terms of playing the side into form (gelling), getting Essendon right now is good. I think if even they were full strength we should win.We shouldn't be relying on injuries to beat opposition sides.
We want to be tested against their best line-up.
In terms of playing the side into form (gelling), getting Essendon right now is good. I think if even they were full strength we should win.
2015 Marvel game plsLets hope we can go against the trend with regards to the past few clashes against Essendon in Melbourne.
It's not his actual 300th
A bit concerned with our forward structure. The good sides will find a way to exploit that lack of mobility, especially in the wet.
Curtin worked his way into the game when he started playing further up the ground. Tex looked like one tall too many even in dry conditions.
We'll go in unchanged though.
Go on?Anyone see the presser? Some interesting comments regarding Curtin.
Pretty straight bat response I thought.Anyone see the presser? Some interesting comments regarding Curtin.
Sounded like they're happy with where he's at, and doing things they're looking for even though those things don't fill up the stat sheets.Anyone see the presser? Some interesting comments regarding Curtin.
Oh so like the Matthew Wright/Jared Petrenko/Ned McHenry/Lachlan Murphy intangible, non-statisical role?Sounded like they're happy with where he's at, and doing things they're looking for even though those things don't fill up the stat sheets.
100%, If we are going to give a dude time in a "non statistical role" I would far prefer to give it to a 197cm pick 6 thats cut out of marble, has great skills and can play nearly every position on the ground.Oh so like the Matthew Wright/Jared Petrenko/Ned McHenry/Lachlan Murphy intangible, non-statisical role?
Only with 100000000x more talent in his big toe alone.
I can get around that
Different players of course but speaking of low stats for talented individuals, Cyril Rioli averaged 15 touches and 1.5 goals a game for his entire career and people hail him as an all time great100%, If we are going to give a dude time in a "non statistical role" I would far prefer to give it to a 197cm pick 6 thats cut out of marble, has great skills and can play nearly every position on the ground.
For what its worth, I genuinely don't think people will describe his impact as non statistical for much longer.