Search results for query: *

How has no one told the guy, hella annoying

Why was there such a knee-jerk reaction. They only had to start paying the obvious holding the balls. They've swung it way too far the other way. They shouldn't change rules that alter the game so much. Ridiculous.

That game by Ryan was one of the worst I've ever seen. Out: Ryan, Sheed, Yeo In: Anyone

5 Yeo clearly bog 4 Reid 3 Waterman 2 Kelly 1 Barrass

You realise clubs will have different trade hands come draft day, why would I make a wild guess, left it open ended at "getting overs" 🤨

Talk about going overboard, loser mentality? what are you going on about?. We finished the year with a percentage of 50, our list is trash, only a few decent youngsters. I'd rather get 2 really good players compared to 1 gun, also Reid isn't guaranteed to be anything. If a club is after pick 1...

Definitely trade out pick 1 for a top 4/5 and 10ish pick if offered. We'll be better for it in the long run, we're so short on quality youngsters. It was only 9 months ago people were talking Chesser up as the second coming, picks aren't guaranteed.

Why are people getting offended over opinions, I'm just going to wait and see how the draftees develop and enjoy the journey. Predictions on first year players never come true, impossible to know whether we nailed the draft or not, what the synergy of the team will be like etc. Ginbey could get...

The mod posts about nicknames, 10/10 comedy. Also should probably wait until these kids play before saying that we killed the draft, happens every year, the reality is that not all of them will come on.

Don't think clubs want players like Pou, comes across as a knob

Because risking pick 20 is totally the same as pick 2....

You can be homesick, but it's a 2 year contract, not hard to tough it out

You didn't exactly go out on a limb, was pretty obvious it might happen. I don't think they did it to take locals though.

I think North did alright. JHF showed that he's a mental pygmy, wouldn't want the guy at my club.

Sydney themselves want to trade up, they won't do that pick swap

Agree with the last few posts, the deal looked alright. We're only sliding 6 picks in a draft where the top 10 is even, we're not going to get more than what we were offered.

No way we are getting 8, 12 and 15, for pick 2 and Rioli. Think we'd be lucky to get 19 instead of 15, probably have to give a later pick back aswell.

Definitely think splitting pick 2 will serve us better in the long term, especially if there's not much difference between pick 3 and 10

Why are the Dogs after him? JUH, Bruce, Naughton, English etc

He made all Australian 20/21. If he gets fit, he'll contribute for 2 years.

Clubs would trade for Darling, guy only just turned 30 and will kick 35-40 goals a year. Also I wouldn't straight swap Allen for Jackson either. Do you even watch West coast?

Need a gun midfielder not a ruckman

1. He held on to the ball for way too long 2. The umpire asked to give the ball back multiple times 3. What are you on about?

He runs through the midfield occasionally, so you can't go on goal averages etc

When fit he's a top 5-10 player for us. Our best i50 kick. There's no point losing him for peanuts, hence why most West coast fans want to hold onto him.

We probably paid him for 2 years while he wasn't playing footy due to failing a drug test, looked after his welfare etc. I don't think many players would leave under the same circumstances.

Dogged West coast hard, don't want people like that at the club

Are you trolling? the ball isn't at the goal post at that point.

Only watched the one highlight video of Tsatas, but he didn't seem to kick through the ball/have his head over the ball. Not a great kick.

I think the right call was made even if by the rules there wasn't definitive evidence to overturn the umpires decision. The umpire obviously made a split decision call that was wrong, he wasn't even in position to see it.