FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
Oh yeah he’s a straight out copycatOk .. I was just smiling over you and Samcrow playing musical av's on Sunday .. or is there something more sinister going on?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Oh yeah he’s a straight out copycatOk .. I was just smiling over you and Samcrow playing musical av's on Sunday .. or is there something more sinister going on?
Oh yeah he’s a straight out copycat
Oh yeah he’s a straight out copycat
We can't give up on next year when we are in finals contention.
We need to trade in experienced players this draft period if we are losing McAdam, Doedee & Himmelberg.
We already have the 2nd most inexperienced list, so we can't get more inexperienced.
Having Dawson break out in the way he did removes the option of us sacrificing next year. Next year is one where we really need to sort our s**t out and take a considerable step towards becoming a serious contender.
Saw this and thought F**k off
but in the interest of torture..I felt duty bound to post this in case anyone was prepared to be a self mortifier
He's in Brad Crouch territory now. Had so many injuries he'll go anywhere he has to to get a long term deal.I think Doedee is more concerned with the length of the deal than the dollar value
But thats the point. Everyone is saying NO to every name put forward saying we need a star mid. Show me a star mid who is walking out on their club?
Im stating we should trade in Hayward to replace McAdam because he is an experienced 130 game goal kicking forward. In our forward line I think he will take his game to another level because of the space, Tex, Fogarty and Thilthorpe leave. Hell if Murphy is left out because we have Hayward, thats worth the trade alone.
Everyone?But thats the point. Everyone is saying NO to every name put forward saying we need a star mid. Show me a star mid who is walking out on their club?
Im stating we should trade in Hayward to replace McAdam because he is an experienced 130 game goal kicking forward. In our forward line I think he will take his game to another level because of the space, Tex, Fogarty and Thilthorpe leave. Hell if Murphy is left out because we have Hayward, thats worth the trade alone.
He's in Brad Crouch territory now. Had so many injuries he'll go anywhere he has to to get a long term deal.
What does 9.6 mean?Unfortunately it appears it does exist, although haven’t read through all the Rules (or the other determinations that the AFL can make re this).
See clause 9.7 below and https://resources.afl.com.au/afl/do...nded-AFL-Rules-effective-28-February-2023.pdf
My understanding is the mischief it sought to stop was a club not wanting to blow a high pick in matching a bid, so it trades it out, then matches, then trades that pick back in again, paying the holding club for the privilege.
On that basis, it has no place applying in trading a pick back the following year, but seems unambiguous!
View attachment 1808231
Hayward plays higher up the ground than McAdam, in a similar way to Murphy, but better.He replaces McAdam.
Murphy played with McAdam.
Hayward will also.
I'm not sure we can afford to, if we just delisted 4 blokes, and we are trading another 4, we are going to have to spend the picks at the draft!I'm not sure we need to stash draft picks for next year. We have a fair few out of contract next year, player we can trade and thus get draft capital for points.
Everyone?
I have no issue making a strong play for a star midfielder... but it's a very long shot to get someone who is under contract
Agree we should be looking at smart trades in to provide experience to the squad. Don't have to be guns, but best 22 or useful depth.
It means that we could trade McAdam to Melbourne, Grundy goes to Sydney and we get Hayward and it would be a valid trade even though we didn't get anything from Melbourne.What does 9.6 mean?
Does it mean we can claim to be involved in a trade in which we neither gave away, nor received anything from two other clubs who are trading with us? And that counts as a 3 way?
Never said he was fringe!The dudes been in Sydney's best 22 for a few years. He isn't a fringe player. So trading for him is smart if we can get him for the lowest cost. I'd probably even try and just trade for Hayward outside of the McAdam deal. probably would get him for a 2nd rounder if swans are desperate to clear cap space.
I am warming to Hayward as he will help us structurally. He helps us because if he is a threat up forward, it means Rankine, Pedlar and Rachele get to spend more time in the midfield and that makes us betterNever said he was fringe!
Just saying we need to get in a few players who are either best 22 or fringe.
If we swapped Hayward for McAdam & Berg for Choi, it would be a good start. Then just need to bring someone in for Doedee, but not necessarily a like for like.
I would have no issue with Hayward, so long as we don't pay a 1st rounder for him.I am warming to Hayward as he will help us structurally. He helps us because if he is a threat up forward, it means Rankine, Pedlar and Rachele get to spend more time in the midfield and that makes us better
Never said he was fringe!
Just saying we need to get in a few players who are either best 22 or fringe.
If we swapped Hayward for McAdam & Berg for Choi, it would be a good start. Then just need to bring someone in for Doedee, but not necessarily a like for like.
Say we trade with Melb and Syd. We can send a pick to Melb, they can send a player to Syd, and Syd can send a player to us.What does 9.6 mean?
Does it mean we can claim to be involved in a trade in which we neither gave away, nor received anything from two other clubs who are trading with us? And that counts as a 3 way?
hayward this year stats is murphy have a lookI’m not sure Hayward is worth pick 23 AND McAdam.