Golumless
A bigger deal out west.
Not sure I agree. I would love to think the idea behind our interest is to free up both Rachele and Pedlar to move through the midfield more. Losing McAdam, given his potential and x factor is a big loss. Hayward, while not a like for like, does help mitigate this loss.
The thing is both of those players are too low in importance in our forward line that you don't need to do anything extra to cover them. It's not like you're taking Rankine out of the forward line who is the line leader and drawing a main defender. One of the easiest solutions in that regard would be to use Thilthorpe more as a third tall, instead of as the after thought we used him as this year (second lowest TOG% out of our regulars).
The biggest thing McAdam offered was coverage if we lost Rankine. Beyond that though, he's another goal a game forward in a forward line flushed with them.
Can play McAdam's role inside 50 and can play Murphy's role outside 50 so neither players are needed anymore.......
That's not how football works.
Last edited: