Autopsy AFL 2024 Round 4 - Freo v Blues Sat April 6th 4:20pm AEDT (AO)

Who will win and by how much?

  • Freo by a goal or less

    Votes: 8 10.7%
  • Carlton by a goal or less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Freo by 7 - 20

    Votes: 20 26.7%
  • Carlton by 7 - 20

    Votes: 27 36.0%
  • Freo by a lot

    Votes: 5 6.7%
  • Carlton by a lot

    Votes: 12 16.0%
  • Draw

    Votes: 3 4.0%

  • Total voters
    75
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Fremantle won the free kick count +4 on the match, and had (I believe) 6 out of 9 goals.come directly from free kicks. Final decision aside they got.the rub of the green in this one...
You have to be taking the piss or not right upstairs to say Freo got the rub of the green in a game that was decided by the umpires.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Free kick in the middle of thebground for dissent after carrying on about the touch. Didn't stop sooking after the free in the middle, so it becomes a 50. Not the way you want to see a game end, but pretty standard stuff as far as making the call.
It was a slight deflection off the shoulder. Can't expect the umps to see that. Doesn't matter how sure you are that they got it wrong, you aren't going to make them change the call. They still had a chance from there and threw it away.
Not correct. It's the greater of middle or downfield - so any dissent forward of the middle results in an instant free where it occurs.
 
No, it shouldn't. The Carlton player dragged it under, so the entire onus is on him to release it. Sitting on the ball with your arms out after you've dragged it under still counts as posession.
I am all for if you drag it under its a free kick if you don't get it out, but its the worst thing about our game when a defender holds the ball while tackling someone and it should cancel it out in the same way if you duck into a tackle its not high free kick.

Irrelevant to the decision in this game its cringeworthy trash.
 
They should go up to him after the siren and let Rio can't pay another free kick after the games done

It’s a stupid rule IMO with far too much grounds for interpretation.

  • Player throws arms in the air in frustration- dissent
  • player swears - dissent
  • player looks at the umps the wrong way - disaent
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Rubbish, I can't stand Carlton, but it was not an outright mistake by the umpire, maybe brushed Aish's tricep.

The fault is in the immaturity of Freo.

Still 40 seconds to go, back in the middle 6,6, 6, they still had a chance.

Instead they yelled at the umpire with dissent.
Freo's fault, nobody else's.


On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Agreed and they were dominant around the stoppages all game. They only have themselves to blame for that.
 
Freo are paying Jackson $1m a year and he is rucking against Crippa with 1min left in their d50 and Jackson taps the ball outside. How dumb can you get. Lost them the game.
 
If they paid dissent week in week out I’d be like - that’s fine. But I literally haven’t seen a dissent call for about a full season, so to pull one out to seal the game is just such a joke. It’s the inconsistency that kills you.
Fair comment.
 
Good win for Carlton

They played like crap against a pretty good opponent, but they stuck at it and pinched the 4 points

I just knew the Blues would a find a way, especially with 2 minutes left and Freo trying to block it up like there was 20 seconds remaining. They needed to clear the ball from defence. Not force ball ups in front of the Carlton goals. They invited trouble.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy AFL 2024 Round 4 - Freo v Blues Sat April 6th 4:20pm AEDT (AO)

Back
Top