List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Latest news and rumours

Done deals:



  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted


Ongoing discussions:




  • List Manager Matt Clarke appeared on Sept 11 Gettable - Click spoiler below for summary
    On the draft: "We predicted that the draft was strong, but it's probably gotten stronger during the year."

    On top end of draft: "You could probably make five or six different choices and get it right."

    On Pick 3: "I reckon there's five (players) around that mark."

    On splitting: "I think you want to hold an early selection if you can. The depth of this group allows you to maybe have some movement there, and see what you can do to bring in more talent in the first 20-25 picks. Easier said than done, and I think most clubs would be saying the same thing. We'll see what we can do."

    On Liam Baker: "He's still yet to make a decision. They're still weighing up a few things. We'd love to get Liam on board from what he offers from a talent and leadership point of view. We understand where we're at as a group, we're rebuilding our group, we need to add some guys in the middle tier to support our young group."

    On Jack Graham: "We've got a number of players that we're speaking to. A bit of a wait and see on that one as well. We'll talk to a number of guys."

    On Shai Bolton: "I think it will be difficult for anybody, really. He's heavily contracted and a high quality player."

    On James Peatling: "He's heavily involved in a finals series at the moment so I don't want to comment too much on it, but I think there's a number of guys that have been playing really good footy this year that could suit what we do and what other clubs do. He's taken his footy to another level this year."

    On Tom Barrass: "We've had an early discussion with Hawthorn about it, they understand where we're at. He's nominated Hawthorn as his ideal destination. We want what we think he's worth, as a genuine key back in the competition that can do what he can do. We're obviously mindful of getting an appropriate deal for West Coast."

    On Tom Clurey: "Maybe (note: sounded very non enthused). We'd probably need some key back depth, whether that's through the draft or trade and free agency."

    On Jack Darling: "We've had initial discussions with his management group about (moving). We're open to talking, as we are with all of our players, but Jack's contracted with us."

    On Liam Ryan: "I expect him to be at West Coast next year, yes." (The most definitive answer of the day by a mile, a non-starter of a talking point.)

    On out of contact players e.g. Rotham, Witherden, Jones: "We're still working through what it looks like from a list point of view, and how many selections we'll want to have, and players that may come in and potentially may go out. You might want to give a coach an opportunity to look at these guys."

    On Harley Reid: "We've had discussions most of the year with his management group. I think it sits in a really good place. We're open to doing really whatever they want to do to be honest. We're really confident in building the right system around Harley, on and off field, to make sure that he's really comfortable, that he's going to play his best footy, and his long term future."

    On Jake Waterman's new deal: "Yep, really close. We're working really closely with his management on that. I expect that we'll have something done pretty soon."

    On Oscar Allen: "We've been talking with Oscar and his manager most of the year on that one. We're going through some stuff at the moment. I think we'll be ok with that one."



Past rumoured targets:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this ad.

Darling an Eagle.
Wake me up when it happens

Weekend At Bernies Hello GIF
 
When people watch Matt owies play,they will realise he is zac langdon 2.0.
 
Who will be our 24-28 year olds ?

Literally no one
Thats the age that we will be targeting when we are a good team again, as free agents. Even if we dont, if the bulk of the list is around 27 years old, the impact of having some veterans is less than when the bulk of the list is 22.

Itll be fine, the 21-25 bracket isnt critical to fix immediately, the bracket thatll be the leaders once Yeo/Gov retire are the ones to chase right now
 
Thats the age that we will be targeting when we are a good team again, as free agents. Even if we dont, if the bulk of the list is around 27 years old, the impact of having some veterans is less than when the bulk of the list is 22.

Itll be fine, the 21-25 bracket isnt critical to fix immediately, the bracket thatll be the leaders once Yeo/Gov retire are the ones to chase right now
That bracket can be fixed when Yeo/Gov retire, not during the best draft in recent years…
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)


First round means **** all if those picks are both in the 20+ range which is perfectly possible next year and the reason everyone, bar those with academy access is trying to get into this draft, not out of it Jon you ****ing simpleton.

Hawks ****ed up by making a dumb shortsighted trade and now expect us to pay the price for it.
 
To be honest I think that probably gets it done.

Would’ve preferred 14+F2 but it seems like the F3 coming back was the sticking point for that

F1 + F2 = 14…. I know it may have been used for Baker, but 14 is still a better offer than F1 + F2.

2x F1 would be ideal, even if we had to give something back (F2). But if not I think we have to hold out for F1 + 2x F2 as our worst option.

or we just keep TB, honestly not the end of the world for us (especially if we are getting 0 current draft currency..)


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Well that’s fine Hawthorn, the price was a first and second all the time until you chucked a kiddy tantrum and went and traded pick 14, now it’s a future first so not worth as much you F’n campaigners. So the new price is the two F1 picks.
 
Any Draft watchers able to shed light on FOS for me please? Is it a case similar to Judd with injury concerns dropping him down the order to approx 3? Are these actually career concerning? From what I have read production/growth for the year isn’t as expected, but it’s a symptom of a disrupted year, no?
What is the differentiator between he and Draper?
 
Any Draft watchers able to shed light on FOS for me please? Is it a case similar to Judd with injury concerns dropping him down the order to approx 3? Are these actually career concerning? From what I have read production/growth for the year isn’t as expected, but it’s a symptom of a disrupted year, no?
What is the differentiator between he and Draper?

No, the injuries aren’t a long term concern, he was just incredibly unlucky with a few different injuries throughout the year, mostly relating to his finger. He just wasn’t ever able to fully fire because he clearly wasn’t fit.

He’s definitely not going to be Judd, but he’ll be a very good player, his aerial ability for his size is incredible and he’s one of the best inside 50 kicks in this draft, a good runner with a decent set of wheels on him too.

The main worry for me would be his accumulation ability at the next level, not sure if he becomes the ball pig that we desperately need.

I’d say the difference between him and Draper is FOS is more athletically gifted, Draper is better as a pure inside midfielder, both are good on the outside, FOS is more dangerous in the front half and is a better ball user. FOS look like he could be a good leader but Draper seems to already be an exceptional one.

I think FOS has the higher ceiling out of him and Draper but Draper is probably a safer pick, if that makes sense.
 
F2 Hawks better be gong to Baker. Add 23 if we have to
Hawks' F2 on its own isn't going to cut it for Baker, nor does adding 26 make any sense. 26 on its own is reasonable given Baker is out of contract and not a midfielder or KPP.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top