Analysis Hawthorn rebuild: are they tanking?

Should Hawks Be Punished?


  • Total voters
    681

Remove this Banner Ad

How can you pay ‘legitimate’ frees to Jack when moments before he fakes a free by flinging his head back when the opposition player merely taps him on the shoulder, and then moments after the missed free he does the exact same again. His staging for frees is rampant, and unless he changes his ways he will get zero sympathy from umpires.

Fair enough but look at the footage he’s genuinely being restrained.

Some if the other incidents may fit your description

And hard not to have head move backwards in a coat hanger
 
Players do it all the time. You feel or sense someone immediately behind you and dive forward as though being driven into the ground. I reckon Ginnivan deserved 2 frees but as I keep saying how can you blame the umpires for missing a legitimate free when Ginnivan fakes head high contact etc so often and did so before and after the legitimate frees yesterday? They may well have written Ginnivan off because of his poor acting.

As for the other free you mention, the free score was +1 Hawks way. There were plenty of frees that Geelong missed out on.

Last comment just highlights the free ride you cats fans are used to
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Charlie had already won a Coleman at the same age. Lewis is only a year younger than him. It’s time to put it all together.

He reminds me a bit of Charlie Dixon. Obviously very talented. Goes through an injury set back most years so you cut him some slack. Next year is the big year for Charlie. Before you know it he is 33 years old and hasn’t done a great deal throughout his career, but once every 6 weeks he’ll have that massive game that reminds you just how talented he is.

Will Mitch ever win an AA like Charlie did?

Mitch is a good player but he ain’t Charlie or Harry.

I don’t think he needs to be in order for the hawks to be good though. Just build more pieces around him.
 
There were plenty in the first 3 quarters.

Even in one of the ones that was a genuine free everything he was doing was trying to get a free kick from lowering his body to raising his arms to force the tackle higher. It still should've been paid regardless.

But it puts the umpires in an impossible position when he's doing everything to force the tackle high and repeatedly faking high contact. How do you tell the 1 in 10 that's genuine high contact and wasn't instigated by Ginnivan?

Nice how you decide ginnivan decided to stage in the last quarter ‘only’. An alternate reason may be the increasing slippery conditions. But play on, why not shore up a myth
 
Nice how you decide ginnivan decided to stage in the last quarter ‘only’. An alternate reason may be the increasing slippery conditions. But play on, why not shore up a myth

I think you misread. He was staging the entire day. I've just watched the replay and it was continual and utterly blatant.

Not sure how the commentators expect the umpires to perfectly separate the 2 legitimate frees from the 3-4 where he causes the high contact (ie not supposed to be a free now) and the 6-8 where he just fakes the contact.
 
I think you misread. He was staging the entire day. I've just watched the replay and it was continual and utterly blatant.

Not sure how the commentators expect the umpires to perfectly separate the 2 legitimate frees from the 3-4 where he causes the high contact (ie not supposed to be a free now) and the 6-8 where he just fakes the contact.

We expect them to do their job. Like everyone else. If they can’t see a professional foul saving an almost certain goal

But what’s new. AFL couldn’t even get the restart time message right yesterday
 
That is clearly not what was happening in the coat hanger tackle. There’s footage there, quick hand pass to Bruest or moor in that footage and an almost certain goal.

Professional foul by the Geelong 9


Also is/was which do you mean. I’ve seen very little of Jack ‘running at the man’ this season

Were you watching yesterday?
 
Just to put things in perspective. Its on the umpires to rule objectively on each individual contest. That is what they are there for.


It was plain to see for everyone that he should have got the frees

Anyways we move on
 
The question on my mind is "will Hawthorn ever be successful while ignoring the elite of the draft?" I don't think anyone has ever asked that
The problem with all the handouts these other clubs are getting we still haven't be able to get to the elite end of the draft
 
Just to put things in perspective. Its on the umpires to rule objectively on each individual contest. That is what they are there for.


It was plain to see for everyone that he should have got the frees

Anyways we move on
So the AFL admits they were wrong...

I'm sure the mob will admit likewise when they said he shouldnt have got them...

 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The problem with all the handouts these other clubs are getting we still haven't be able to get to the elite end of the draft

Sometimes it's down to luck. Some drafts the elite end can stretch out to 7-8 picks. Sometimes it's down to 1 or 2 players.

I think last years draft there was a clear gap between Reid and Walter, and a strong chasing pack between McKercher and Sanders.
 
Just to put things in perspective. Its on the umpires to rule objectively on each individual contest. That is what they are there for.


It was plain to see for everyone that he should have got the frees

Anyways we move on
Given Mitchell's post match comments focusing on how Ginnevan can improve his approach, does this mean Hawthorn won't seek a please explain from the AFL?
I guess they aren't mutually exclusive
 
Given Mitchell's post match comments focusing on how Ginnevan can improve his approach, does this mean Hawthorn won't seek a please explain from the AFL?
I guess they aren't mutually exclusive
Sam and the club didn't need to, as the AFL got on the front foot and contacted us about it. We move on.
 
Sam and the club didn't need to, as the AFL got on the front foot and contacted us about it. We move on.
And he probably now gets a good run against Collingwood this week for the enjoyment of everyone
 
The best bit about Ginnivan is this week they'll pay the 1-2 that are there but probably also pay 4-5 that he stages for. And which opponent cops it when he finally starts getting paid frees after 18 months? Collingwood😂😂😂
 
Drawing head high tackles and faking head high tackles are two distinct issues. Yes Selwood drew free kicks by drawing the opposition player's arm around his neck. Ginnivan tries to draw free kicks by faking a head high tackle. If you cannot see the distinction then that's on you. The umpires and the AFL can see the distinction.

Leigh Matthews repeatedly said it should be up to the tackler to ensure no contact was made with the head.
You seem so keen on what Leigh said when it was protecting Selwood

Maybe have a listen

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis Hawthorn rebuild: are they tanking?

Back
Top