Wettoaster
Team Captain
- Apr 22, 2023
- 527
- 415
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Out Brockman, you what now??Out: Gaff, Brockman, Darling
In: Dewar, Barnett, Maric.
Sent from my Nokia X30 5G using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Out Brockman, you what now??Out: Gaff, Brockman, Darling
In: Dewar, Barnett, Maric.
Probably the best game chesser played today
Rawlinson would play that role better than Dewar ..after watching port run the ball the length of the ground from our attacking zone it’s scary to think what Whitfield, Aish, idden, perryman and Callaghan will do…
We need to get a pacey defensive forward from somewhere… maybe dewar is it
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yep, this.I’m not going to criticise the selection of Gaff in hindsight because I understand the rationale for picking him - he’d done enough over the preseason overall to get first crack. Especially with Sheed, Hewett and Hall (who was underdone) being unavailable for selection
Of the senior players though his spot was the most vulnerable
He had a really bad game. Really bad to the extent that it’s near impossible to justify him being retained for next week
Gaff was always likely to be the canary in the coal mine for Simpson’s claim of there being no more credits in the bank. One round in and that claim is going to be tested
Either Simpson’s committed to the rebuild and selects the team on merit accordingly or he keeps Gaff in the side
So Gaff out and Chesser into the 22
Either Jones or Hall should come into the 23 to replace him. My preference would be Jones with the intention of using him as the sub giving Hall the chance to play a full WAFL game
I’d then have Gaff as the non-playing emergency rather than put him in a WAFL practice match as the other players need the game time more than him
Barring injury I don’t think any other changes are necessary
Surely gaff playing in the wafl just means a top up player doesn't play right?I’m not going to criticise the selection of Gaff in hindsight because I understand the rationale for picking him - he’d done enough over the preseason overall to get first crack. Especially with Sheed, Hewett and Hall (who was underdone) being unavailable for selection
Of the senior players though his spot was the most vulnerable
He had a really bad game. Really bad to the extent that it’s near impossible to justify him being retained for next week
Gaff was always likely to be the canary in the coal mine for Simpson’s claim of there being no more credits in the bank. One round in and that claim is going to be tested
Either Simpson’s committed to the rebuild and selects the team on merit accordingly or he keeps Gaff in the side
So Gaff out and Chesser into the 22
Either Jones or Hall should come into the 23 to replace him. My preference would be Jones with the intention of using him as the sub giving Hall the chance to play a full WAFL game
I’d then have Gaff as the non-playing emergency rather than put him in a WAFL practice match as the other players need the game time more than him
Barring injury I don’t think any other changes are necessary
A duo without merit. Who was crappier? Waterman was also unsighted after the first few minutes. When Petro is our highest score something isn't working down forward. Then again our two key defenders look to be on their last legs.A lot of people potting Darling and yes he wasn't great but Allen was a traffic cone today (giving him a pass due to gastro) and his man ran off him all day to double Darling.
Surely gaff playing in the wafl just means a top up player doesn't play right?
Jones would be a good sub, can play across all lines wherever needed
On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I actually think they'll stick with the same (or minimal changes) and try and get some continuity into the side.
Doubt we have had many, if any, "no changes" over the last 24 months
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Its hard when he is on 1 million + for this year.Re Gaff - gonna be interesting to see how MC react (or not). Might go a long to tell us what their strategy is for the rebuild. Youth or credits?
Apparently that is brockmans 1 wood .after watching port run the ball the length of the ground from our attacking zone it’s scary to think what Whitfield, Aish, idden, perryman and Callaghan will do…
We need to get a pacey defensive forward from somewhere… maybe dewar is it
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Its hard when he is on 1 million + for this year.
Having him play wafl on that coin makes the club look foolish .
Is it really a surprise though, I feel like he was pretty terrible for most of last yearI cannot seem to get over how monumentally bad Gaff was
Its not just his pace that has changed .The club looks foolish anyway.. it’s just the level that can be changed and selection integrity has to come into it..
At the end of the day we have $900,000 to a million bucks tied up into a wingman… and not a Peter matera wingman who could win games off his own boot or change games… here we have a slow guy with questionable skills who for all his good points years ago has never been a game winner or a game changer….
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Well they are foolish.Its hard when he is on 1 million + for this year.
Having him play wafl on that coin makes the club look foolish .
Yep, this.
Poor by Gaff. That output wouldn't even cover the hotel bill, let alone his flight ticket and as we all know, definitely not his wage.
Barrass gets to make Hogan look like pick 1 next week. Seriously hope he has a better game.
I think travelling with the team can be a great experience for younger players.That wasn’t my point
Each weekend one player effectively sits out as a non-playing emergency just in case someone can’t play. This weekend it was Dewar who travelled but didn’t play
Next weekend, even though we don’t travel, someone still won’t play WAFL on Saturday so they’re available on Sunday (vs GWS) as an emergency.
I’m suggesting Gaff be that player
Burgiel didn’t kick 4 goals. That’s been misreported due to an error on the WAFL site
Apologies if you knew and were just taking the piss with the 4 goals bit