We need more not less.I was thinking the same thing.
With a healthy list we are going to be a nightmare to match up on, I don't remembere a team with this much quality flexibility.
Sent from my SM-G990E using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We need more not less.I was thinking the same thing.
With a healthy list we are going to be a nightmare to match up on, I don't remembere a team with this much quality flexibility.
Sent from my SM-G990E using Tapatalk
I am not interested in what Essendon and StKilda do. Can’t see this happening. How/who are the hawks going to get forward, what gun mid do we target, that is of interest.I really hope that St Kilda get Merrett only so we can play everyone’s favourite game - watching Essendon burn multiple first round picks on average at best talent!
I mean, I know all these answers but why don’t you tell me your answers first and I’ll tell you if I have the same ones…I am not interested in what Essendon and StKilda do. Can’t see this happening. How/who are the hawks going to get forward, what gun mid do we target, that is of interest.
I am not interested in what Essendon and StKilda do. Can’t see this happening. How/who are the hawks going to get forward, what gun mid do we target, that is of interest.
I agree. I wasnt saying otherwise.We need more not less.
I agree. I wasnt saying otherwise.
Sent from my SM-G990E using Tapatalk
We are pursuing but GWS plan to make him honour it is what I am hearing.Tops, you have mentioned Max G from GWS bring a player of interest.. is that still being looked at??
Haven’t seen a lot of him but I think an athletic tall forward should be a priority over a Perryman type..
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
We are pursuing but GWS plan to make him honour it is what I am hearing.
Thanks mate.
I hope we have other 3rd tall options in our sights. It’s our lists weakest link in my mind. If Lewis returns well, then we’ll be ok, but that’s no sure thing. I’d have used our first rounder on this player type but that picks goneski..
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Got my nose broken by Colin when he came back to Tas to play with a errant elbow. Highlight of my playing careerAhhhh - Colin Robertson.
Who = Gunston & = Breust?
The actual Gunston & Breust now offer different things than the players of old did.
Feel like they'll take DGB and our firstJust wondering what everyones thoughts are on what we'll end up giving up for Barrass? IMO I think a fair deal is pick 13 (likely to be around pick 16) + a 3rd rounder. All this talk of 2 x 1st rounders in the WA media is likely being floated as a means of them getting what they actually want which is pick 16 + 2nd rounder.
If this is the case then like in all haggling processes do we end up doing pick 16 + F2 with a F3 coming back? If I had to guess then this is what I think the deal ends up looking like that is if there are no players being included.
I agree on this but would also suggest Scrim has shown how well he reads play in flight and would be a possible for the third tall in forward line. We will have ridiculous flex next year on line up from quarter to quarter and the more players can move round the harder it is to setup against us.I suspect one of Weddle or Sicily plays higher up next year.
Lewis coming back mid-year.
Wouldn't be surprised if we go for a tall forward with Pick 30 either. There are a few around that range.
Pick 13 is fair for Barrass. We are probably giving up a decent player with that pick (Day, Weddle went around that mark). DGB will be delisted, so not sure he adds much value.
Thinking this years first and next years 3rd should do it, unless a player is added instead of F 3rd. It is his age and his lingering back issues that discount the deal.Just wondering what everyones thoughts are on what we'll end up giving up for Barrass? IMO I think a fair deal is pick 13 (likely to be around pick 16) + a 3rd rounder. All this talk of 2 x 1st rounders in the WA media is likely being floated as a means of them getting what they actually want which is pick 16 + 2nd rounder.
If this is the case then like in all haggling processes do we end up doing pick 16 + F2 with a F3 coming back? If I had to guess then this is what I think the deal ends up looking like that is if there are no players being included.
There are some roles in football that are constant and not changing. I didn't say it to necessarily compare players to past players. Just using past players as an example of the role played rather than a long winded explanation of what a medium lockdown defender does. Most people remember stratton as a player who could play tall and small, take marks and generally had low possession numbers. So Frost into that role as opossed to the full back role he played this year.Just curious but why do we have to compare our current (some not even obtained yet) to our past greats? Maybe just let them develop their own identity. The game is totally different now and not many of the players compared above play anything like each other so really what's the point.
If there's 2x first rounders involved it will likely just be our first for their 2nd type senario. If they deem our F1st not enough, we add our first pick 13 for their 2nd pick 21. So we essentially slide down a bit.Just wondering what everyones thoughts are on what we'll end up giving up for Barrass? IMO I think a fair deal is pick 13 (likely to be around pick 16) + a 3rd rounder. All this talk of 2 x 1st rounders in the WA media is likely being floated as a means of them getting what they actually want which is pick 16 + 2nd rounder.
If this is the case then like in all haggling processes do we end up doing pick 16 + F2 with a F3 coming back? If I had to guess then this is what I think the deal ends up looking like that is if there are no players being included.
10 years from now is on the back burner. All those players want to win premierships now. Its not going enter their frame of mindWe also need to think that Watson, Dear, Mass, Moore, Weddle, Newcombe, Day still want young talent to come in for 10 years down the track. Giving up draft picks easily is doing a disservice to them
10 years from now is on the back burner. All those players want to win premierships now. Its not going enter their frame of mind