Autopsy AFL 2022 Round 3 - Dogs v Swans Thurs March 31st 7:20pm AEDT (Marvel)

[SuperMal]

Hahaha they must have taken it down then? One of those temporary articles that disappear after a few days? Provide a source to that quote you claim was put on the AFL website or stfu. You won't because it never happened.

Stop making shit up you absolute clown.

Oh look....seems a goose has come south for the summer...

AFL’s review of Grand Final finds umpiring was not up to the standard expected

AFL review finds GF umpiring not up to par

www.foxsports.com.au

 

[Sentinel]

Oh look....seems a goose has come south for the summer...

AFL’s review of Grand Final finds umpiring was not up to the standard expected

AFL review finds GF umpiring not up to par

www.foxsports.com.au

Hmm that's strange, it seems a little different to what you originally said (below) and what I called you out on. It's not the AFL website, nor does it state anything about missed free kicks which would have resulted in goals. Looks like you did make it up after all, you absolute pillock.

Yep. The article on the AFL web site the week after the GF went on to say “ The Umpires Dept acknowledges 3 free kicks should have been paid to the Swans, which would have most likely resulted in goals“

If you can provide a link to the afl.com.au article with the quote you mentioned (or even something along those lines, I'll be generous) then I'll happily concede, until then I agree, you certainly are a goose.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

Oh look....seems a goose has come south for the summer...

AFL’s review of Grand Final finds umpiring was not up to the standard expected

AFL review finds GF umpiring not up to par

www.foxsports.com.au

Someone in one of the many #freekickbulldogs threads last year did a chronological analysis of the game and description of each free paid to both sides. You should have a look for it.

 

[SSwans2011]

That same analysis apparently isn’t afforded to the dogs, hey?

You're the one throwing out insults, I'm just pointing out reasonable comparisons where those insults might be more appropriate.

 

[SuperMal]

Someone in one of the many #freekickbulldogs threads last year did a chronological analysis of the game and description of each free paid to both sides. You should have a look for it.

I was there...there was enough missed in the last quarter to bring the outcome under serious question.

You got the win....you don’t get to claim it was legit.

 

[SuperMal]

Hmm that's strange, it seems a little different to what you originally said (below) and what I called you out on. It's not the AFL website, nor does it state anything about missed free kicks which would have resulted in goals. Looks like you did make it up after all, you absolute pillock.


If you can provide a link to the afl.com.au article with the quote you mentioned (or even something along those lines, I'll be generous) then I'll happily concede, until then I agree, you certainly are a goose.

You’re right...I should have quoted it verbatum to meet your exacting standards...

......whereas you, my feathered friend...can insist no such article exists...,then try to change the subject when you’ve revealed yourself to be the holder of Seat 1A on the Dogs Stupidity coterie.

I think it’s called a FAIL, in goose-ville.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

Thats possible.

It’s definite

 

[SuperMal]

It’s definite

Yes...its definite that the course of the game would have adjusted - it’s possible that would be in the Swans favour.....or possibly the Dogs.....

But as two were unpaid in the Swans 50.....there’s a high likelihood the Swans would have got a run on.

But why are we arguing hypotheticals?......it’s pointless.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

Yes...its definite that the course of the game would have adjusted - it’s possible that would be in the Swans favour.....or possibly the Dogs.....

But as two were unpaid in the Swans 50.....there’s a high likelihood the Swans would have got a run on.

But why are we arguing hypotheticals?......it’s pointless.

You wouldn’t have had the chance of two more goals, maybe one from either and that’s only a maybe. But I think you’re getting the idea

Maybe there could been other anomalies but life - and our game of footy - is annoying in that nothing is certain!

The moving finger writes…

 

[maddog37]

Yes...its definite that the course of the game would have adjusted - it’s possible that would be in the Swans favour.....or possibly the Dogs.....

But as two were unpaid in the Swans 50.....there’s a high likelihood the Swans would have got a run on.

But why are we arguing hypotheticals?......it’s pointless.

I like this part of the article the best.

“The Sydney coaches’ own review of the Grand Final largely attributed the loss to not having enough contributors from their 22 in comparison with the more evenly-performed Bulldogs.”


The rest of your whining is irrelevant.

 

[SuperMal]

I like this part of the article the best.

“The Sydney coaches’ own review of the Grand Final largely attributed the loss to not having enough contributors from their 22 in comparison with the more evenly-performed Bulldogs.”


The rest of your whining is irrelevant.

Congratulations...you now own Seat 1B.....

There’s also a bridge in Sydney I’d like to sell you....or perhaps an allotment on the moon......

 

[SuperMal]

I like this part of the article the best.

“The Sydney coaches’ own review of the Grand Final largely attributed the loss to not having enough contributors from their 22 in comparison with the more evenly-performed Bulldogs.”


The rest of your whining is irrelevant.

Or...you can have a think about what the Afl policy on Umpire criticism would mean to a premiership-losing coach.....

.....and try and think of something sensible to post?

 

[maddog37]

Congratulations...you now own Seat 1B.....

There’s also a bridge in Sydney I’d like to sell you....or perhaps an allotment on the moon......

Oh ok, I will leave you to your ivermectin tablets and MAGA hats. Carry on.

 

[SuperMal]

Oh ok, I will leave you to your ivermectin tablets and MAGA hats. Carry on.

I think you should ponder on my sig.

 

[maddog37]

I think you should ponder on my sig.

More irrelevant nonsense. You lost. I will quote your article again for emphasis

The Sydney coaches’ own review of the Grand Final largely attributed the loss to not having enough contributors from their 22 in comparison with the more evenly-performed Bulldogs.

 

[Bald]

Do Sydney supporters ever question that Barry Hall was not suspended for a blatant punch to the stomach of Matt Maguire because it was deemed within play despite the ball being 45 meters away?

The same Barry Hall who captained the club to their first premiership in 80 odd years. He also contributed two goals to a game where the margin was only 4 points.

 

[Sentinel]

Do Sydney supporters ever question that Barry Hall was not suspended for a blatant punch to the stomach of Matt Maguire because it was deemed within play despite the ball being 45 meters away?

The same Barry Hall who captained the club to their first premiership in 80 odd years. He also contributed two goals to a game where the margin was only 4 points.

It doesn't suit the embarrassing victim complex, so no.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

Can we pause this futile discussion until round 17?