Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I would rather Hately take Mchenry's spot & berry move to murphy's role. Then add another mid in - O'connor it would seemI agree, but the pesky AFL requires us to name 23 players.
Yep. Not sure where this Newchurch stuff is coming from. He's some way off even getting managed minutes at AFL level.
Agree Berry to spend time mostly forward. Would love to see a tall forward come out as well, Fog for me, and give O'Connor a run through the middle as well. Also think there's some opportunity to push a small defender forward, and bring in Chayce Jones.
Changes in brackets are what i'd like to see, but probably won't)
Out:
McHenry
Murphy
McPherson (sub)
(Mackay)
(Fogarty)
In:
McAdam
Hately
Worrell/Murray
(O'Connor)
(Jones)
Why would McAdam come in?
He stunk it up for 4 weeks in the AFL, then went to the SANFL and was probably the worst player on the ground. I'd think he needs some form before he gets picked again.
And it has to be McAdam.With two small forwards out we will pick one of McAdam or Newchurch. Neither are suitable options
Why can't berry play forward? Hately? these guys have the skills to play that role for this week just as much as an underperforming mcadam. Perhaps he needs a wake up call.And it has to be McAdam.
And it has to be McAdam.
Schoenberg would be great in a small forward role, has shown he has an eye for the goals. Happy to run him and Berry forward for this week give them a break from the crash and bash would do them good.Or, as Kane has suggested, we move Brown forward. Perhaps bring Jones in for a shot in defence.
Rowe, Berry and Brown as small forwards, with Sloane and Schoenberg rotating through half forward.
This is the type of game to give Ben Davis a run, if he’s fit enough after his layoff.
I think it's time we get creative.
Dood to play forward.
Tex in the midfield.
Laird as a small forward.
Sholl in the ruck.
Let's mix it up!
Brown won't be playing forward. There's creative and then there's fanciful.Or, as Kane has suggested, we move Brown forward. Perhaps bring Jones in for a shot in defence.
Rowe, Berry and Brown as small forwards, with Sloane and Schoenberg rotating through half forward.
This is the type of game to give Ben Davis a run, if he’s fit enough after his layoff.
I think it's time we get creative.
Dood to play forward.
Tex in the midfield.
Laird as a small forward.
Sholl in the ruck.
Let's mix it up!
I wasn't really serious about it, more saying it's not as far fetched as people would think - but when you put it that way, I mean, at least Matty Wright can stick a tackle.....I would take matty wright on our AFL list 10 billion times more than I’d have mookay on it..
Thats the craziest thing.. people would scoff at the club if it picked wright up in the mid season draft, and probably rightly so, yet this bloke...
View attachment 1124427
This bloke isnt even fit to tie matty wrights boot laces...
Matty wright’s “experience and leadership” is the type of experience and leadership i’d be happy to put into the AFL side if they are going to stubbornly stick to this “must have a certain quota of experienced players in the team” agenda they clearly have at the moment..
No, I remember that game, and I'm pretty sure at least 90% of the 16km was the little circles he ran around in during his 3 possessions trying to find a clever kick around a cornerSee you can get great numbers running away from the ball
I don't think we will and I think it would be negligent if we did.And it has to be McAdam.
I have said since I first saw Doedee come in to the side that I thought he was a future midfielder. He has great hands, and is deceptively evasive, I can only hope that we haven't tried it to this pont due to Tom's injury history. If we never give the Dood a shot in the midfield to see what he can do it will be a huge wasted opportunity for our club.
Why would McAdam come in?
He stunk it up for 4 weeks in the AFL, then went to the SANFL and was probably the worst player on the ground. I'd think he needs some form before he gets picked again.
Seriously? He had 3 of those in the last quarter against North (who had fully given up) after giving away 3 goals in the 3rd quarter. He got two goals gifted to him in the goal square after other people did the work. He had 8 disposals and 1 goal in the SANFL.He had 6 goals in the last 4 AFL games, hardly stunk it up did he?
2nd highest goalscorer and we dropped him after ONE game with zero goals.
Mark my words he'll come straight back in, because a fit McAdam is better than any experimental ideas floating around like Luke-fu(king-Brown playing up forward.
McAdam and Hately are absolute locks to come back in, the rest is up for debate.
I would rather Hately take Mchenry's spot & berry move to murphy's role. Then add another mid in - O'connor it would seem
Long term I think that's how I would like it but would rather thilthorpe not have the 2nd defender at this point. I also like frampton cause he can crash a pack which we don't otherwise have. I saw your other post on Mcadam and statistically he had his best games prior to being dropped. I think it was the emotional reaction from the giants loss that made him a scape goat. The only thing is like you mentioned if he comes back in we probably can't play Frampton/ bergIf we take one of our FOUR talls out, preferably Fog or Himmelberg, then there's plenty of room for McAdam, Hately and O'Connor into the team, whilst also pushing Berry forward.
My dream selection this week would be:
Out:
Murphy
McHenry
Mackay
McPherson
Fogarty/Himmelberg
In:
McAdam
Hately
Jones
Worrell
O'Connor
McPherson - Sub