- Mar 26, 2015
- 12,680
- 23,061
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Melb Tigers, Bendigo Braves, Aussie NBA
It's not weird at all. How the rule was umpired when it was first introduced has no bearing on how it's umpired today. There's been an obvious change and softening since it first came in.Weird rant.
My observation was based on all of the dissent calls & non-calls I've witnessed since the rule was introduced.
Some umpires will invoke the rule if a player points at the replay on the big screen, others don't. Some umpires call dissent if a player raises their voice at them, others will just ignore it.
The rule should be 100% either way.
Pointing at the screen, or telling an ump to watch the replay has been confirmed as dissent. If you're just pointing without saying anything, then the ump has to see it. Sometimes the ump is standing in front of the player, setting the mark, and the player is pointing behind their back.
Raising their voice? Would need examples of this. Can't say I recall seeing that called.