Review Good vs West Coast, R13 2023

Who played well against West Coast?

  • Chayce Jones

  • Ben Keays

  • Lachlan Murphy

  • Riley Thilthorpe

  • Josh Rachele

  • Rory Sloane

  • Luke Pedlar

  • Jordan Dawson

  • Taylor Walker

  • Jake Soligo

  • Max Michalanney

  • Mitch Hinge

  • Izak Rankine

  • Josh Worrell

  • Ned McHenry (sub)

  • Nick Murray

  • Rory Laird

  • Wayne Milera

  • Darcy Fogarty

  • Brodie Smith

  • Lachlan Sholl

  • Jordon Butts

  • Reilly O'Brien


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

It was probably the one thing this group lacked at home, a proper and ruthless demolition of a poor side. Good time for it too, as percentage will likely dictate who finishes where.

Tex getting 10 was the major highlight, and without any injuries, there isn't a complaint for me. A tick in every sense of the word.
 
I gotta agree.
It makes me wonder what Nicks is thinking.

Sounds like a statement about being ruthless.

Especially as there is no genuine benefit to giving kids CBAs, and hopes of an elimination finals berth this year could come down to percentage, it's reasonable.
 
him and Dawson the onky mids at the moment that will run hard forward with the ball and try and break forward of the contest. No way he should g9 back to sanfl. Sloane and Murphy should be the first 2 out.
He's too good to be going completely AWOL in 20% of matches though. If he was still responding to his bad games with coaches votes tier performances then I'd be inclined to agree and shelve the issue for this season to be solved in the next-preseason.

But that's increasingly not the case.

MCrouch didn't deserve to be dropped for one disappointing game in 2016, but the break turned him from a 20 disposals per game player into an All-Australian
 
Sounds like a statement about being ruthless.

Especially as there is no genuine benefit to giving kids CBAs, and hopes of an elimination finals berth this year could come down to percentage, it's reasonable.
No genuine benefit?
I find that very hard to believe.
So what happens when we actually get injuries and we have to start bringing in blokes for their first game or close to it, or play blokes in the center that haven’t been exposed to it?
Surely no one thinks we can continue on this lack of injury ride much longer?
 
No genuine benefit?
I find that very hard to believe.
So what happens when we actually get injuries and we have to start bringing in blokes for their first game or close to it, or play blokes in the center that haven’t been exposed to it?
Surely no one thinks we can continue on this lack of injury ride much longer?

The thing is players like Dawson coming in and hitting the ground running in the midfield is normal, even if they've never played there as a pro. That playing half forward, half back, or any role that isn't a KP is ultimately developing a player to play inside midfield. Inside midfield is purely about talent, and being fit/strong enough to use said talent. It's not a specialised role that anyone needs to be exposed to it and given time to work shit out.

When injuries hit, a player like Soligo or Pedlar gets more inside minutes. If they're ready to step up, they'll run with it and change the face of our side doing so. If not, it'll be a downgrade. Regardless if they've been exposed or not.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

suculant Asian meal.
be3aae73cb17e8626c239ea2cec62b8f
 
So? It’s still AFL, you can’t win a game by 122 points and play poorly. Can you imagine actually saying out loud to someone that your club didn’t play well after winning by 20 goals?
Once again you, and some of your human centrepede mates, completely miss the fxxkn point because you are so desperate to defend everything the club does.

no one here thinks it was a shit win. It was a massive win even if it was against the worst side ever assembled in AFL history.. injury ravaged and cooked.

and it was a brilliant night for Tex.. and the team played bloody well.

what a few are saying is it was a massively missed opportunity to really blood some of our youth in the middle.. I mean… a lad like soligo attending less CB’s than Sloane??.. come the fuxk on.. we have another lad in Jones who is on fire at the moment playing his best footy for the club and is showing us the speed, skill and grit that they picked him up for.. but did he even get one run in the middle today?.. did he attend one centre bounce?.. even with us 120 points up?

thats poor coaching. God help us when sloane finally retires, laird and dawson are cooked, and keays slows.. we’ll have a heap of 20-26 year old midfielders that have fuxk all real experience playing in the centre and attending CB’s to replace them with.

but at least we can fondly look back at that time we absolutely flogged West Coast to death!.

the way some carry on around here you wouldnt think we’ve gone 25 years without a flag.. i mean.. sure, being a west coast supporter must be tough at the moment.. until you remember that they‘ve actually won a flag in the last 5 years.
 
Still think we will atruggle for the top 8. Our away games include Collingwood, Melbourne, Brisbane and Essendon. And we have port at home.

5 and 5 won’t get us a finals spot. Not in a 23 game season.

5 and 5 would put it down to percentage at worse, and likely us outright making it, seeing that's a 13-12 record to end the year. Really, I wouldn't put it past us to have the highest out of the teams vying for that 7th-8th spot. After all, we've just creamed West Coast and have a few easy kill match ups.

There won't be 9 teams above a 500 win record this year, seeing there isn't enough soft kills in the league.
 
Last edited:
I expected us to beat west coast by 120-150. It met my expectations.
Your backtracking is not effective, nor helping.
In the post that has prompted disagreement you said: "Didn't think we played that well today.".

You expected the Crows to win by 120-150 and the 122-point win "met [your] expectations".
Uhhh, wait --- does that mean you expected them to not play "that well"?

The Crows' score was the AFL's highest for 7 years. To win by 150, they would have had to kick another 28 points (while keeping WCE to 8.4) ie 31.16.
C'mon.
Your expectations are way too high
This, most definitely ...
Lol, kicking the highest AFL score in 7 years only just met your expectations.

Perhaps time for you to call it a night...
... and this.
 
Anyone catch the last question of Nicks's press conference? He said something along the lines of "I don't want to be a controversial coach and I don't want to end up in those types of conversations but we all have two eyes" and then it cut out..... What was he referring to?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Review Good vs West Coast, R13 2023

Back
Top