Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’s had a whole pre season - looked like he beefed up a bit - that’s bad if he’s still unfit !Joel shouldn't play next week, he isn't fit
The poster's name is Donza - not BomzaThis is a bit unfair Bomza. Lloyd not having a role or being a valuable member of the team is an interesting hill to die on considering he could've easily finished as high as 4th in last year's B&F if two of his games weren't written off because of concussion. In our 2022 GF run, Lloyd had the 4th most votes in the B&F during the last eight games, behind only three inside mids. Evidently there's very much a place for him in our best team and our best footy.
You're entitled to your opinion but it has comparatively less evidence behind it than those on the contrary, so to say people have "blinkers" on is a little unfair.
Hopefully we can start getting the SCG back as our place where other teams fear to tread. Its been a while but even the mind games help. The Lions winning streak is right up there with Geelongs home ground advantage atm.
LolId back Amartey to win the coleman if not for his injuries.
The Salad calls him "Bomza' because he is our go-to for weather predictions, my friend.The poster's name is Donza - not Bomza
I think stats that say Lloyd was top 5 Swans player over an 8 game stretch 2 years ago have zero value today
To say Lloyd would've finished higher in last years B&F if he wasn't injured ?? The same can be said of any player. Id back Amartey to win the coleman if not for his injuries.
Of course Donza is entitled to having an opinion
I reckon Lloyds days are numbered. We might be seeing Roberts play a few more games in Lloyds position this year, in preparation for when Lloyd 'passes the baton' (to use Swans language)
ok, missed that.. sorry Im not into c88s cliques. Im not allowed to respond or disagree to his posts so I try not to read. Makes it hard as he posts soooo much.The Salad calls him "Bomza' because he is our go-to for weather predictions, my friend.
Thev3 talls don’t work imo
Be playing Hayward deep at times as a focal point and dropping amartey and playing a small in wicks
It's not cricketDon’t write off Joel yet. Terrible conditions for the talls. On a dry pitch v Pies we need to see what he’s got.
Wicks is a must. Forget whether or not he kicks goals, his manic pressure and ability to lock it down in F50 is critical esp w 3 not so fast talls.
Would also like to see Gus in some capacity - even as sub.
I know, I know, who goes out. An embarrassment of riches.
Lol watIm not allowed to respond or disagree to his posts
I agree. We looked clunky with all 3 on. But I'd still keep picking 3 tall forwards in the best 22. Allows a constant rotation of 2 tall targets and resting Grundy on the bench. With the advent of the sub, we can afford to have this luxury and bring on the sub later in the game like we did on Thursday night. Also, if a tall goes down, having the extra one will mean our structure is not effected as much.Thev3 talls don’t work imo
Be playing Hayward deep at times as a focal point and dropping amartey and playing a small in wicks
I don't think he's not fit, just lacks killer instinct and mental energy. It's inbetween the ears with him I rekn, struggles to get into the mindset that would allow him to impose himself.Joel shouldn't play next week, he isn't fit
Totally agree Liz. He covers the ground well, strong on the lead, a beautiful field kick and can nail them more often than not from the 50m arc. I would've thought with Heeney in the guts, now would be the perfect time to unleash him as a high HF, pushing up the ground in the same style as Nick Reiwoldt or Pavlich, especially as we have Mclean, Amartey and Fox to do the man on man stuff.I want far more evidence - in different conditions, against different opponents - before drawing a conclusion about whether a three talls structure can work.
I am a little perplexed by the idea the Swans have trained over the off-season with the idea of having McDonald as the deepest tall. It doesn’t seem to play to his strengths at all.
You gotta hand it to players like Fox and Cunningham. They play their roles and keep reinventing themselves for the team. They aren’t out best players but I am sure they are right up there as the coaches favourites.Fox is the perfect forward half player to do all the non-statistical impacting work & someone who can play a shutdown role on opposition halfbacks. He & Wicks have to start next week imo, it's no coincidence our forward line functioned better when he was subbed into the game.
I don't think he's not fit, just lacks killer instinct and mental energy. It's inbetween the ears with him I rekn, struggles to get into the mindset that would allow him to impose himself.
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but why was McDonald playing close to goals? Surely his skill set (originally a mid, good field kick, good mark on the wing, good engine) favours playing upfield while Amartey (who can pack mark) is better playing close to goals.
I commented earlier about my perplexion at McDonald playing deepest forward. In this instance I guess it is possible they thought May might show more respect to McDonald than to Amartey, despite the fact that McDonald clearly didn't have the strength/body size to out-position May, while Amartey may (and only "may") have been able to jump from behind to contest marks.Not sure if this has been mentioned, but why was McDonald playing close to goals? Surely his skill set (originally a mid, good field kick, good mark on the wing, good engine) favours playing upfield while Amartey (who can pack mark) is better playing close to goals.
So much this. No ego and do what ever the coach asks of them. Team men through and through.You gotta hand it to players like Fox and Cunningham. They play their roles and keep reinventing themselves for the team. They aren’t out best players but I am sure they are right up there as the coaches favourites.