Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt he'll do it much against other rucks. In his interview with Fox, Grundy said it was a team effort to be physical to Gawn to wear him downI was fascinated by Grundy's technique in the centre bounce.
The moment the umpire started the bounce motion, he sprinted staright over to Gawn & blocked him from getting a running leap.
They both jumped from the same side of the ball.
Expect to see the AFL outlaw the technique shortly, as it'll doubtless have Vic clubs whining about it.
I get that, but there's a lot of lost time there. Moreso than McLean, who had long stretches of little impact and quieter reserves form than Amartey, yet in just the 2nd half of last year really solidified a spot, picked up his impact.I'm probably a bit rough on Armatey. But he's nearly 25 & across his career to date averages:
7 disposals
1 goal
At some point (pretty soon), he needs to start to contribute a bit more than that.
Injuries certainly haven't helped, but I think the jury is still out on whether he's actually AFL standard.
I know we didn't really use him on the inside much, but I'd be hesitant to drop him given our midfield stocks. Yeah, we could make him sub, but probably wouldn't after 1 game, when Heeney might not have the same impact every week.I'm sure this'll be popular but Jordon felt like a bit of a spare part with Lloyd, McInerney & Campbell on the wing. He got better as the game went on but I doubt we'd miss him if he wasn't in the team.
I just think that forward half pressure is absolutely non-negotiable, so Wicks has to be in the team.
Perhaps, but I thought Rowbottom, Warner & Gulden were all below their usual standards, so if Heeney fades there's plenty to pick up the slack.I know we didn't really use him on the inside much, but I'd be hesitant to drop him given our midfield stocks. Yeah, we could make him sub, but probably wouldn't after 1 game, when Heeney might not have the same impact every week.
I do agree that Jordon is the most likely if Wicks comes in, given our love of 3 KPFs. Just considering the opposition.Perhaps, but I thought Rowbottom, Warner & Gulden were all below their usual standards, so if Heeney fades there's plenty to pick up the slack.
This of course is under the assumption that Horse wants to keep Amartey in. If he doesn't, then Jordon stays and everything's fine, just means we run a shorter forward line. Given Horse's tendency towards the three talls though, it does feel like he'll persist with it. I kind of hope he does - hard to judge them off the last two matches.
Man that pisses me off.Wicks staying as sub...
Someone on here said only a few listed players played reserves?Our depth was poor last week in the seniors and ressies practice matches. But we drafted, traded and developed well during the week to rectify things.
I was joking about how we see people lamenting our depth one week, and thinking it's great the week after. Despite nothing actually changing. Not necessarily the same people though.Someone on here said only a few listed players played reserves?
On CPH2471 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Actually I thought Jordan very good in the second half. His first half was forgettable. I think that is understandable seeing he was playing against his old side. There would have been a lot of psychological stuff to get through. Then there is the fact they know how he plays.I'm sure this'll be popular but Jordon felt like a bit of a spare part with Lloyd, McInerney & Campbell on the wing. He got better as the game went on but I doubt we'd miss him if he wasn't in the team.
I just think that forward half pressure is absolutely non-negotiable, so Wicks has to be in the team.
Yeah, we obviously trust him, he played 84% TOG (7th), didn't do much wrong.
With apologies to Donza (this will likely result in a demarcation dispute) - the early forecast for Friday is showers.I do agree that Jordon is the most likely if Wicks comes in, given our love of 3 KPFs. Just considering the opposition.
Of course, I wouldn't put it past us to go unchanged. Wicks staying as sub...
He played inside in the second half & was much better. He had 5 disposals at half time & ended up with 18.I know we didn't really use him on the inside much, but I'd be hesitant to drop him given our midfield stocks. Yeah, we could make him sub, but probably wouldn't after 1 game, when Heeney might not have the same impact every week.
Yeah. On a night where we know the ball is slippery and the oppo doesn't have a big backline, we'd definitely go for the smaller, pressure option.With apologies to Donza (this will likely result in a demarcation dispute) - the early forecast for Friday is showers.
3 talls & no Wicks on a wet night? Surely not.
He was good. His disposal was good. His kick ins were Blakey like. His tackling was vice like. I like him a lot.Yeah, we obviously trust him, he played 84% TOG (7th), didn't do much wrong.
That said, we may rotate him a bit to not overload any of the younger guys. But it's been 1 week and we have an early bye anyway.
I didn't mind his game at all. I was saying maybe he'd be vulnerable if we wanted to bring Wicks in but also play the three talls. I feel like Wicks is more important than Jordon at this point. Evidently Horse & co don't agree.Actually I thought Jordan very good in the second half. His first half was forgettable. I think that is understandable seeing he was playing against his old side. There would have been a lot of psychological stuff to get through. Then there is the fact they know how he plays.
On CPH2471 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yes
and this took the pressure of Hayward who normally plays that role, enabling Hayward to be not so tired and kick some goals.Robbie Fox was nowhere near our best but being at the ground helped me see how hard he was working as the high half forward runner type that bedford accurately forecasted he would be. His running is quite something to watch live. A couple of shots at goal and some quality tackles made it a good first game in the role for a guy I’ve always been very fond of. Wholehearted and tireless worker of a player that every club needs.
I have no idea how he does it.There aren't many that can tackle Petracca.
Rowy never missed.
He's become 2nd only to Errol in terms of "please please pleeeeeeease announced he's re-signed".
Jordon or Campbell. The only other option is Fox. Tough call.I'm sure this'll be popular but Jordon felt like a bit of a spare part with Lloyd, McInerney & Campbell on the wing. He got better as the game went on but I doubt we'd miss him if he wasn't in the team.
I just think that forward half pressure is absolutely non-negotiable, so Wicks has to be in the team.
If we maintain the same structure, probably.